Outer Rotor Air Compressor Control for Stable High Discharge

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing air compressors face challenges in increasing discharge amount without causing motor rotation instability, excessive noise, and load variation, particularly when using outer rotor motors with large sound-generating rotors and limited current supply.

Innovation Solution

Employing an outer rotor motor with a controller that adjusts stator winding voltage based on rotor position, separates current components, and uses vector control to stabilize motor rotation, while incorporating a position sensor and temperature sensor for precise control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the number of rotations is increased to improve compression efficiency, then discharge amount increases, but generated sound increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedischarge amountVSAvoidgenerated sound
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the motor control system adjustable and adaptive. The controller dynamically adjusts voltage based on rotor position and separates current components to optimize motor performance across different operating conditions, enabling discharge amount increase without proportional sound increase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes motor control parameters by adjusting voltage applied to stator winding based on rotor position information. It separates current into torque-generating and flux-generating components, independently controlling each to optimize the balance between discharge amount and sound generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If cylinder diameter or stroke is increased to increase discharge amount, then discharge amount increases, but motor torque requirement increases and stable rotation cannot be obtained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedischarge amountVSAvoidmotor rotation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameters by implementing vector control that separates current into d-axis (flux) and q-axis (torque) components. This enables independent optimization of magnetic flux and torque, providing stable motor rotation even when cylinder dimensions are increased for higher discharge amount

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback from the position sensor to continuously monitor rotor position and adjust voltage accordingly. This closed-loop control stabilizes motor rotation by compensating for load variations that occur when cylinder diameter or stroke is increased

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Use of energy by moving object

If current is limited to suppress power supply within upper limit value, then power consumption is controlled, but discharge amount cannot be increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoiddischarge amount
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the use of limited current by changing control parameters to separate current components. By independently controlling flux-generating and torque-generating current components, the system maximizes discharge amount within the power supply's current limits without exceeding the upper limit value

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent recovers and utilizes magnetic flux more efficiently through controlled field weakening. By optimizing the flux component separately from the torque component, it extracts maximum productive work from the limited current supply

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Force

If motor drive current is increased to generate high torque, then torque increases, but electromagnetic force increases and generated sound increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor torqueVSAvoidgenerated sound
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of current waveform from simple sinusoidal to vector-controlled with separated components. By controlling the torque and flux components independently, it generates required torque with optimized electromagnetic force, reducing sound generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Suppresses generated sound and stabilizes motor rotation even under load variation, enabling increased discharge amount without enlarging the compressor size.

Implementation Method 1

a motor configured to drive a compression mechanism for compressing air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12445072B2Air compressor
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 MAX CO LTD
  • US12445072B2 patent drawing
  • US12445072B2 patent drawing
  • US12445072B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An air compressor includes: a motor configured to drive a compression mechanism for compressing air, and a controller configured to control the motor. The motor is an outer rotor motor including a stator and a rotor disposed on an outer side of the stator. The controller is configured to adjust a voltage applied to a stator winding of the stator, based on position information of the rotor.