Outlier Detection for Missing Clinical Questions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Health practitioners often inadvertently fail to ask patients for important information during appointments, leading to inefficiencies in patient treatment and administrative processes, such as requiring additional appointments for missing data.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning system that uses encoders to aggregate and cluster clinical note information from past appointments, identifying outliers in new records by comparing encoded features, and generating prompts for practitioners to ask missing questions based on identified gaps in information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If practitioners rely on manual note-taking during appointments, then they can record information as it occurs, but they may inadvertently forget to ask important questions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of information captureVSAvoidmissing clinical questions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by analyzing historical medical records and identifying important questions that should have been asked before the current appointment concludes. The outlier detection mechanism proactively identifies gaps in the current appointment's information capture by comparing it against patterns from similar historical cases, allowing practitioners to ask missing questions before the patient leaves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring the information captured during appointments and providing real-time or post-appointment recommendations for questions that were not asked. The outlier detection mechanism feeds back deviations from typical information patterns, enabling practitioners to address missing information gaps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If practitioners ask more questions to ensure complete information, then information completeness improves, but appointment time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of patient informationVSAvoidappointment duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of historical data to pre-identify which questions are most critical for specific appointment types and conditions. By preparing these question recommendations in advance based on outlier detection, the system enables practitioners to focus on asking only the most essential missing questions rather than systematically reviewing all possible questions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by selectively identifying and recommending only the most critical missing questions rather than all possible questions. The outlier detection mechanism filters out minor deviations and focuses on significant information gaps that would materially impact patient care or billing, allowing practitioners to address key omissions without excessive time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If practitioners require additional appointments to obtain missing information, then information completeness improves, but patient convenience and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadequacy of treatment informationVSAvoidefficiency of treatment process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of missing information needs during or immediately after the appointment, enabling practitioners to address gaps while the patient is still present. By using outlier detection to flag information deficiencies before the appointment concludes, the system eliminates the need for follow-up appointments in many cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system empowers practitioners to self-identify information gaps through automated outlier detection and question recommendations, reducing reliance on external reminders or administrative follow-up. The mechanism enables practitioners to independently ensure complete information capture without requiring additional scheduling or coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If practitioners manually review historical records to identify important questions, then they can learn from past experiences, but the complexity and time required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of clinical judgmentVSAvoidcomplexity of information processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical process of manual record review with automated machine learning-based outlier detection. The system automatically encodes historical medical records, identifies patterns, and detects deviations in current appointments, substituting computational analysis for human cognitive processing of historical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates encoded representations (copies) of historical medical records that capture essential patterns and features. By working with these compressed encodings rather than full historical records, the system efficiently identifies important question patterns without requiring practitioners to manually examine extensive historical documentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11687577B2Identifying missing questions by clustering and outlier detection
Publication Date: 2023.06.27 EVERHEALTH SOLUTIONS INC
  • US11687577B2 patent drawing
  • US11687577B2 patent drawing
  • US11687577B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A machine learning system may be used to suggest clinical questions to ask during or after a patient appointment. A first encoder may encode information and a second encoder may encode second information related to the current patient appointment. An aggregate encoding may be generated using the encoded first information and encoded second information. The current patient appointment may be clustered with similar appointments based on the aggregate encoding. Outlier analysis may be performed to determine if the appointment is an outlier, and, if so, which features contribute the most to outlier status. The system may generate one or more questions to ask about the features that contribute the most to outlier status.