Outlier Screening for Manufacturing Quality Control
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current quality control methods in manufacturing are resource-intensive and costly due to the need for extensive data analysis and testing of numerous parameters, which can be streamlined to reduce the number of measurements required for screening manufactured units.
Innovation Solution
The method involves measuring multiple parameters on manufactured units until failures occur, normalizing pre-failure data to identify outlier parameters, and using these parameters to screen subsequent units, thereby reducing the number of measurements needed for quality control.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If multiple parameters are measured and analyzed for each manufactured unit, then quality control reliability is improved, but testing costs and time consumption increase significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the quality control process into two phases: (1) an initial phase where multiple parameters are measured on units until failures occur to identify critical parameters, and (2) a subsequent phase where only those identified critical parameters are measured on all units. This segmentation reduces the measurement burden from measuring all parameters on all units to measuring only critical parameters on subsequent units.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent performs preliminary action by measuring multiple parameters and analyzing failure data before mass production screening. The pre-failure data analysis identifies which parameters are most indicative of defects, allowing the screening process to be optimized beforehand. This preliminary parameter identification phase enables more efficient subsequent screening.
2Reliability
If multiple parameters are measured and analyzed for each manufactured unit, then quality control reliability is improved, but testing costs increase significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the quality control process into two phases: (1) an initial phase where multiple parameters are measured on units until failures occur to identify critical parameters, and (2) a subsequent phase where only those identified critical parameters are measured on all units. This segmentation reduces the measurement burden from measuring all parameters on all units to measuring only critical parameters on subsequent units.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent applies partial action by measuring only the critical parameters identified from failure analysis on subsequent units, rather than measuring all parameters. This partial measurement approach is sufficient for quality control purposes and significantly reduces testing costs while maintaining reliability.
3Measurement precision
If vast amounts of data are generated and analyzed, then measurement precision is improved, but resource consumption increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts only the critical parameters that are most indicative of failures from the full set of measured parameters. By analyzing pre-failure data and identifying which parameters show the strongest correlation with defects, the method extracts a small subset of critical parameters for ongoing screening, eliminating the need to process vast amounts of data from all parameters.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent creates a simplified model or copy of the full measurement process by using only the critical parameters identified from initial failure analysis. This copied screening process uses a small subset of parameters rather than the complete parameter set, reducing data processing requirements while maintaining quality control effectiveness.
Data Source
AI summary
Multiple parameters of manufactured units are continually measured until some of the units fail, where failure can be accelerated by adjusting operating conditions. Pre-failure data is then examined to find outliers or aberrant parameter values that may have contributed to the failures. The data is normalized to allow different parameters to be compared to one another. The parameters producing the highest outlier values are then used to screen subsequently manufactured units, thus significantly reducing the number of measurements that have to be taken to screen the units. Lower outlier values for these parameters are, however, used in screening subsequently manufactured units to “catch” potentially defective units.


