Outlier Software Component Remediation via Reference Stack Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Software development faces challenges in efficiently integrating and maintaining high-quality, up-to-date software components, as existing code modules can be inefficient or introduce security risks, making it difficult to distinguish between effective and ineffective modules, especially in fluctuating usage demand scenarios where resource optimization is crucial.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for outlier software component remediation, which involves a dependency evaluation module that analyzes integrated components by comparing them with reference projects in a database, applying filters to select a reference stack, and identifying outlier components for replacement, ensuring only necessary and secure modules are used, thereby improving processing efficiency and hardware utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If existing code modules are integrated into new software programs for rapid development, then development speed is improved, but software quality and security deteriorate due to inability to distinguish effective from ineffective modules

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment speedVSAvoidsoftware quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically evaluates software components by comparing them against reference stacks and generates feedback reports identifying outlier components. This feedback mechanism enables developers to quickly recognize which integrated modules are effective and which are ineffective, maintaining high development speed while improving software quality through automated assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates reference stacks by copying and analyzing successful software configurations from a database. By comparing newly integrated components against these reference copies, the system can automatically identify outliers without requiring manual analysis of each component, thus maintaining rapid development while ensuring quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple software components are integrated to provide functional capabilities, then system functionality is improved, but hardware utilization deteriorates due to inclusion of unnecessary modules

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidhardware utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and identifies unnecessary software components by comparing the actual component list against reference stacks. Outlier components that do not align with reference configurations are extracted from the integration, ensuring only necessary modules remain. This maintains system functionality while optimizing hardware utilization by removing redundant components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of component selection by using automated evaluation criteria to determine which components should be included. By transforming the selection process from manual to automated parameter-based comparison, the system achieves both functional completeness and hardware efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If software components are updated to improve security, then security is improved, but system complexity increases due to need to distinguish between necessary and unnecessary updates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidupdate management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically evaluating and identifying outlier components without requiring manual intervention. The automated evaluation process handles the complexity of distinguishing necessary from unnecessary updates, reducing update management complexity while maintaining security through continuous automated assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides automated feedback on component necessity and security implications. By continuously comparing components against reference stacks and providing clear identification of outliers, the system simplifies update management complexity while ensuring security through automated evaluation of all integrated components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11093241B2Outlier software component remediation
Publication Date: 2021.08.17 RED HAT INC
  • US11093241B2 patent drawing
  • US11093241B2 patent drawing
  • US11093241B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Outlier software component remediation is disclosed. For example, a dependency evaluation module executes on a processor to determine an input stack including references to a first plurality of components incorporated in the program and a plurality of metadata tags associated with the first plurality of components. A plurality of selection filters is applied to the plurality of reference project manifests to select a reference project manifest as a reference stack. The first plurality of components identified in the input stack is compared with a second plurality of components identified in the reference stack. A component in the input stack is selected as an outlier component based on the reference stack lacking a reference to the component.