Oval Waveguide Cross-Section for Stable 3D Printing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional waveguides with rectangular cross-sections face manufacturing challenges when curved or non-rectilinear shapes are required, as additive manufacturing processes struggle with cantilevered portions, leading to precision issues and instability during printing.

Innovation Solution

A waveguide device with an oval cross-section, featuring two straight sides connected by rounded or straight segments, facilitating 3D printing by reducing cantilever problems and enhancing stability, with a length-to-width ratio between 2.05 and 3.5, which also minimizes signal attenuation and allows for flexible orientation during printing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional rectangular waveguides are manufactured using additive manufacturing, then the manufacturing process becomes automated and scalable, but cantilevered portions cause printing instability and precision loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing automationVSAvoidprinting precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The waveguide cross-section is changed from a rectangular shape to an oval shape. This curvature eliminates the cantilevered portions that cause printing instability in rectangular waveguides, allowing the entire structure to be supported during additive manufacturing while maintaining the desired waveguide functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Adaptability or versatility

If curved waveguide shapes are required to connect misaligned equipment, then the adaptability of the waveguide system increases, but the additive manufacturing process becomes more difficult due to cantilevered portions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewaveguide configuration flexibilityVSAvoidadditive manufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The oval cross-section provides inherent curvature that allows the waveguide to be manufactured in curved configurations without creating problematic cantilevered portions. The rounded geometry distributes structural support more evenly throughout the print process, enabling curved shapes to be manufactured with the same ease as straight sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Loss of energy

If the waveguide cross-section is optimized for signal transmission, then the signal attenuation decreases, but the manufacturing complexity increases due to specific geometric requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal attenuationVSAvoidgeometric complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The waveguide cross-section is defined by specific geometric parameters (oval shape with controlled aspect ratio between 2.05 and 3.5) that optimize signal transmission by minimizing attenuation. While these parameters create specific geometric requirements, the oval shape itself is simpler to manufacture than complex rectangular designs with multiple internal features, as it eliminates cantilevered portions and provides uniform structural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11923591B2Waveguide device and method of manufacturing this device
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 SWISSTO 12 SA
  • US11923591B2 patent drawing
  • US11923591B2 patent drawing
  • US11923591B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Waveguide device for guiding a radio frequency signal at a given frequency f, the device including: a core manufactured by additive manufacturing and including side walls with inner and outer surfaces, the inner surfaces delimiting a waveguide channel, wherein a cross-section of the channel has two straight sides joined together by two half-portions, at least one of the two half-portions being rounded or formed of at least two straight segments, the cross-section having a maximum length (a) and a maximum width (b), the ratio between the maximum length (a)/maximum width (b) being between 2.05 and 3.5, preferably between 2.05 and 2.4.