Oven Steam Tank Welded-Shell Design to Reduce Assembly Complexity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ovens for baking food products are complex and costly due to the number of components in the tank, lid, and gaskets, leading to long assembly cycles and potential assembly mistakes, and the separate separation chamber increases complexity.

Innovation Solution

The oven design integrates shells connected by welding, with a single-piece separation chamber and tank components, eliminating the need for gaskets and reducing assembly complexity by manufacturing key parts as a single piece, such as the coupling sleeves and level sensor connections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the tank is made with a cup-shaped container, closing lid, and gaskets to ensure fluid-tight sealing, then sealing reliability is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing reliabilityVSAvoidtank component complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the tank body and lid into a single integrated component manufactured as one piece. This eliminates the need for separate gaskets and multiple assembly steps while maintaining fluid-tight sealing through the monolithic structure, directly resolving the contradiction between sealing reliability and device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses injection molding to create a precise replica of the tank geometry in a single manufacturing step. This copying process produces the complex three-dimensional shape with built-in sealing features without requiring multiple components or assembly operations, reducing both complexity and cost while ensuring reliable sealing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of manufacture

If the tank is assembled from multiple components along the assembly line, then assembly flexibility is improved, but assembling cycle time increases and assembly mistakes become more likely

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly flexibilityVSAvoidassembling cycle speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The tank is manufactured as a single integrated piece rather than being assembled from multiple components. This eliminates the assembly line steps for the tank itself, dramatically reducing cycle time and eliminating assembly mistakes while the overall manufacturing process remains flexible through injection molding capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Injection molding allows the tank geometry to be copied precisely in a single manufacturing operation. This eliminates the need for sequential assembly of multiple parts, speeding up production while maintaining the ability to manufacture different tank configurations by changing the mold

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If the separation chamber is distinct and separate from the tank, then functional separation is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional feeding ducts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional separationVSAvoidseparation chamber integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The separation chamber is merged with the tank body into a single integrated component. The internal geometry provides both water storage and steam separation functions within one piece, eliminating the need for external feeding ducts and reducing overall device complexity while maintaining functional separation of water and steam pathways

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design simplifies assembly, reduces costs, and minimizes the risk of assembly errors while maintaining functionality, as the integrated components streamline the production process and enhance maintainability.

Implementation Method 1

a heating device (51), which is arranged inside the chamber (3), so as to provide the heat needed to bake the food products

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

a steam generator (8), which communicates with the tank (7)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 3

a separation chamber (32), which is separate from the tank (7), is arranged between the steam generator (8) and the feeding circuit (9), and is suitable to separate the water from the steam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity separation: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP2650615B2Oven for baking food products
Publication Date: 2024.05.15 ELECTROLUX HOME PROD CORP NV
  • EP2650615B2 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2650615B2 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2650615B2 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The baking chamber (3) of an oven for baking food products is connected to a steam generator (8), which communicates with a water containing tank (7) defined by two shells (10a, 10b), which are permanently connected to each other along a junction line (15).