Overcurrent Detector Voting Circuit for Radiation-Tolerant ICs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electronic circuits in harsh radiation environments, such as space and nuclear facilities, face performance degradation and failure due to ionizing radiation, which existing shielding and device size increases cannot adequately address without compromising speed.

Innovation Solution

A radiation-tolerant overcurrent detection system using multiple comparators with a logic circuit that employs majority or unanimous voting modes, and a programmable circuit for weight assignment, arranged in a non-linear configuration to minimize radiation impact, indicating overcurrents only when a selected number of comparators agree, thereby reducing false positives from ionizing radiation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If shielded packaging is used to protect integrated circuit from radiation exposure, then radiation tolerance is improved, but device size and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation toleranceVSAvoidpackaging weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the overcurrent detection function into multiple independent comparators (at least two comparators) that operate independently. Each comparator monitors current through separate sensing paths, and their outputs are combined through logic circuitry. This segmentation ensures that a single radiation event cannot simultaneously affect all comparators, thereby maintaining detection reliability without requiring heavy shielding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If device size is increased to reduce sensitivity to radiation, then radiation tolerance is improved, but capacitance increases and operating speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation toleranceVSAvoidoperating speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses multiple small-sized comparators instead of a single large comparator. Each comparator is sufficiently small to maintain fast switching speeds and low capacitance, yet the collective system provides radiation tolerance through redundancy. The segmented architecture allows each component to operate at optimal speed while the system as a whole achieves radiation hardness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If multiple comparators are used with voting logic to reduce false positives from radiation, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a voting logic system where the complexity is localized to the logic combination circuitry that merges comparator outputs. The comparators themselves remain simple and identical in structure, maintaining ease of manufacture. The voting logic (requiring a selected number of comparators to indicate overcurrent before triggering detection) is concentrated in a dedicated logic stage, keeping overall design manageable while achieving high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If comparators are arranged in non-linear configuration to minimize radiation impact, then radiation tolerance is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation toleranceVSAvoidlayout precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric or non-linear spatial arrangement of comparators within the integrated circuit layout. Rather than placing comparators in a symmetric or collinear fashion, they are positioned such that a single radiation track (ionizing particle path) is unlikely to pass through all comparator structures simultaneously. This asymmetric distribution provides radiation tolerance through geometric probability, and while it requires careful layout design, it does not demand extreme manufacturing precision beyond standard IC fabrication capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS8896323B2Radiation-tolerant overcurrent detection
Publication Date: 2014.11.25 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US8896323B2 patent drawing
  • US8896323B2 patent drawing
  • US8896323B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for radiation-tolerant overcurrent detection are disclosed. In some embodiments, an integrated circuit may include a plurality of overcurrent detectors, each of the plurality of overcurrent detectors configured to detect a candidate overcurrent event. The integrated circuit may also include a voting circuit coupled to the overcurrent detectors, the voting circuit configured to indicate an overcurrent in response to receiving a selected number of candidate overcurrent events from the overcurrent detectors. At least one of the overcurrent detectors may be subject to detecting the candidate overcurrent in error, at least in part, due to exposure to ionizing radiation.