Overfitting Detection in Neural Network Training via Trained Classifiers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing AI-model training methods face challenges in detecting overfitting without requiring human expertise, often necessitating intrusive modifications or excessive computational resources, and struggle to balance model accuracy with training time.

Innovation Solution

The method involves obtaining training-history data points with corresponding labels to train classifiers, which can identify overfitting status using validation losses, allowing for non-intrusive detection and prevention during the training process by stopping the model if overfitting occurs, thereby saving time and improving accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional overfitting detection methods are used, then human expertise is required and detection accuracy is limited, but automated detection with high accuracy is achieved through trained classifiers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverfitting detection accuracyVSAvoidhuman expertise requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system trains classifiers using historical training data and validation losses to enable automated overfitting detection. The classifiers independently analyze validation loss patterns without requiring human expertise, allowing the system to self-diagnose overfitting conditions accurately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary training of classifiers on historical training data and validation losses before actual model training. This pre-computation of detection capabilities enables automated, high-accuracy overfitting detection during model training without requiring human intervention during the detection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If intrusive modifications are made to existing training systems, then overfitting can be detected, but system complexity increases and existing systems must be modified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverfitting detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem modification requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces trained classifiers as intermediary components that analyze validation loss data without modifying the core training process. These classifiers act as independent detection agents that consume validation loss outputs and provide overfitting assessments, allowing detection capability without intrusive modifications to existing training systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If excessive computational resources are allocated, then detection accuracy improves, but training time increases and resource efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverfitting detection accuracyVSAvoidtraining time efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by using trained classifiers that analyze only validation loss patterns rather than examining all training data comprehensively. This selective analysis approach achieves high detection accuracy without requiring excessive computational resources, maintaining training time efficiency while preventing overfitting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If overfitting is detected late in training, then model accuracy may be compromised, but early detection requires continuous monitoring that increases computational overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidcomputational overhead for monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where trained classifiers continuously analyze validation loss patterns during training and provide real-time overfitting detection. This feedback loop enables early detection of overfitting conditions, allowing timely intervention to preserve model accuracy without requiring excessive computational overhead through comprehensive monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240152805A1Systems, methods, and non-transitory computer-readable storage devices for training deep learning and neural network models using overfitting detection and prevention
Publication Date: 2024.05.09 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US20240152805A1 patent drawing
  • US20240152805A1 patent drawing
  • US20240152805A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for detecting and/or preventing overfitting in training of deep learning and neural network models. The method has a classifier-training method, an overfitting-detection method, and an overfitting-prevention method. The classifier-training method trains one or more classifiers using training histories and labels of one or more trained machine-learning (ML) models. The overfitting-detection method uses the trained classifiers based on the training history such as validation losses of a trained target ML model to identify an overfitting status of the trained target ML model. The overfitting-prevention method is performed during the training of a target ML model and uses the trained classifiers based on the training history of the target ML model to identify and preventing overfitting of the target ML model.