Overlapping Antenna Layout for Compact Virtual Array Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing antenna apparatuses, as described in US Patent Publication 8665137B2, are upsized due to the separate arrangement of transmitter and receiver antennas, requiring large signal-transmissive ports in vehicles, which complicates installation and increases size.

Innovation Solution

The antenna apparatus is designed with transmitter and receiver antennas arranged to partially overlap each other in a direction perpendicular to their polarization, allowing for a smaller form factor while maintaining functionality through a virtual antenna array configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If transmitter antennas and receiver antennas are arranged completely separately in the second spatial direction S, then the antenna functions are well-defined and isolated, but the antenna apparatus size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantenna function isolationVSAvoidantenna apparatus size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges transmitter and receiver antennas by arranging them to partially overlap in the second spatial direction S, with phase centers positioned between the transmitter antennas. This combining approach reduces the overall apparatus size while maintaining functional isolation through proper spatial arrangement and phase center positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a one-dimensional linear arrangement to a two-dimensional planar configuration on the board surface. By utilizing both the first spatial direction R (for spacing) and the second spatial direction S (for offset and partial overlap), the design achieves compactness without compromising antenna function isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Length of stationary object

If the antenna apparatus size is reduced by arranging receiver antennas between transmitter antennas, then the apparatus footprint decreases, but the distance between transmitter antennas becomes insufficient to accommodate all receiver antennas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantenna apparatus sizeVSAvoiddistance between transmitter antennas
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric positioning where receiver antennas are offset in the second spatial direction S relative to the transmitter antennas, rather than being symmetrically distributed. This asymmetric arrangement allows receiver antennas to be positioned between transmitter antennas in the first direction R while maintaining adequate transmitter spacing through offset in the second direction S.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent resolves the spacing conflict by utilizing the second spatial direction S for offset positioning. This dimensional transition allows the system to maintain the required 4D distance between transmitter antennas in direction R while accommodating receiver antennas in the intermediate region through offset arrangement in direction S.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If transmitter antennas are offset in the second spatial direction S relative to receiver antennas, then functional separation is achieved, but the overall apparatus size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal transmission qualityVSAvoidantenna apparatus area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines transmitter and receiver antennas in a partially overlapping configuration on the same board plane, rather than completely separating them. The phase centers of receiver antennas are positioned between the transmitter antennas, achieving functional separation while maintaining a compact overall area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the two-dimensional board surface effectively by arranging antennas in different positions along both spatial directions R and S. This planar optimization allows functional separation through offset in direction S while maintaining compactness through appropriate spacing in direction R.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces the overall size of the antenna apparatus and minimizes signal attenuation, enabling efficient signal transmission and reception with a smaller footprint.

Implementation Method 1

The at least one first antenna has a reference plane and is configured to perform one of (I) transmission of a radio-wave signal in a predetermined emitting direction, and (II) reception of a reflection signal resulting from the transmission signal transmitted in the predetermined emitting direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

allowing for a smaller form factor while maintaining functionality through a virtual antenna array configuration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal interference and phase combination: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS12500358B2Antenna apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 DENSO CORP
  • US12500358B2 patent drawing
  • US12500358B2 patent drawing
  • US12500358B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An antenna apparatus includes a first antenna, a second antenna, and a third antenna. Each of the second antenna and the third antenna transmits a radio-wave signal in a predetermined emitting direction. The first antenna receives a reflection signal resulting from the transmission signal transmitted in the predetermined emitting direction. The second antenna and the third antenna are arranged to be separate from one another in a second direction. The second antenna and the first antenna are arranged to be separate from each other in the first direction, and at least partially overlap each other as viewed in a first direction.