Overlay Welding Lamination Control for Variable Groove Shapes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing welding technologies face challenges in setting welding conditions for long welding operations, particularly in large structures, where groove shape variations and bending can lead to defects like undercuts and overlaps, and require frequent program changes, reducing efficiency and increasing difficulty.

Innovation Solution

A lamination design method that calculates reference groove shape data, determines the number of lamination layers and layer thickness, and sets welding conditions such as current, voltage, and travel speed based on this data to ensure consistent quality regardless of welding length.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of stationary object

If welding is performed on large structures with long welding lengths, then the target welded structure size increases, but the groove processing accuracy and assembly accuracy deteriorate, causing groove shape variation and bending

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding lengthVSAvoidgroove processing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The welding process is divided into multiple layers (lamination) with predetermined layer thicknesses and numbers. By segmenting the welding into discrete layers with controlled parameters, the system can compensate for groove shape variations and bending that occur in long welding operations on large structures, ensuring consistent weld quality despite deteriorating groove processing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If the number of detection locations is increased to account for groove shape variation, then the measurement precision improves, but the device complexity and program complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegroove shape detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lamination design is performed in advance by predetermined values for layer thickness and number of layers based on reference groove shape data. This preliminary design accounts for expected groove shape variations without requiring complex real-time detection systems, simplifying the device while maintaining measurement precision through pre-calculated compensation parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If welding conditions are manually adjusted for each welding location, then the manufacturing precision improves, but the productivity decreases due to frequent program changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding quality consistencyVSAvoidwelding efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines welding conditions by changing parameters such as layer thickness, number of layers, and welding paths based on detected groove shapes. This automated parameter adjustment maintains manufacturing precision across different welding locations while eliminating the need for frequent manual program changes, thereby improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If automatic welding is performed without considering groove shape variation, then the productivity increases, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates, causing defects like undercuts and overlaps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding automation efficiencyVSAvoidweld bead quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system detects groove shapes at multiple locations and uses this feedback information to automatically adjust welding conditions including layer thickness, number of layers, and welding paths. This closed-loop feedback mechanism maintains manufacturing precision by compensating for groove shape variations while preserving the productivity benefits of automatic welding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250242428A1Lamination design method, welding condition setting method, welding control method, welding control device, and welding system
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 KOBELCO ROBOTIX CO LTD
  • US20250242428A1 patent drawing
  • US20250242428A1 patent drawing
  • US20250242428A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A lamination design method is capable of generally and easily setting welding conditions regardless of whether long welding is performed or not while securing welding quality. A lamination design method for performing multilayer overlay welding on a material to be welded provided with a groove shape using a welding robot includes: detecting a plurality of the groove shapes; calculating reference groove shape data based on a detected plurality of pieces of groove shape data; calculating at least the number of lamination layers and a layer thickness of each layer as reference lamination information based on the reference groove shape data; and calculating the number of lamination layers and a layer thickness of each layer as lamination information of each detection position based on the reference groove shape data, the groove shape data of each detection position, and the reference lamination information.