Overloaded QWERTY Keypad Layout with Central Space Key

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing keypad layouts for text entry on electronic devices, such as smartphones and PDAs, are ergonomically inefficient, leading to high error rates and user discomfort due to overloaded keys and cumbersome input methods like multitap and selector methods.

Innovation Solution

A QWERTY-like keypad layout with a matrix of keys, including function keys and a space-key positioned centrally, optimized for ergonomic design and keystroke efficiency, minimizing the average inter-keystroke distance and incorporating a selector key for intuitive operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the QWERTY keypad layout is used, then user familiarity is maintained, but the aspect ratio is poor (10:4) and key sizes are small causing high error rate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser familiarityVSAvoiderror rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the aspect ratio of the keypad from the conventional 10:4 to an optimized 2:1 ratio. This geometric parameter change allows for larger individual key sizes while maintaining the QWERTY letter arrangement, thereby reducing typing errors without sacrificing user familiarity with the layout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If the 12-key overloaded keypad layout is used, then the number of keys is reduced, but the number of keystrokes per character increases substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of keysVSAvoidkeystrokes per character
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the 26-letter alphabet across 19 keys in a 4-row layout, where the first three rows contain multiple letters per key (overloaded keys) and the fourth row contains single-letter keys. This segmentation strategy reduces the overall number of keys compared to QWERTY while minimizing the average keystrokes per character through strategic placement of high-frequency letters in single-press positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating different key types within the same keypad: overloaded keys in the first three rows and single-letter keys in the fourth row. This local differentiation allows frequently used letters to be accessed with single keystrokes while less frequent letters share keys, optimizing the balance between key count and typing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If overloaded keys with multiple letters are used, then the number of keys is reduced, but disambiguation errors increase due to multiple possible outputs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of keysVSAvoidinput accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by implementing a timeout mechanism that automatically disambiguates consecutive presses of the same overloaded key. When a user presses an overloaded key multiple times in succession, the system waits for a predetermined timeout period before registering the input, allowing the user to complete their intended sequence without accidental misinterpretation, thus preventing disambiguation errors before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If the multitap input method is used, then overloaded keys can be operated, but the number of keystrokes increases and typing flow is interrupted by timeouts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekey overload capabilityVSAvoidtyping flow interruption
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial or excessive action by providing multiple input methods (multitap, selector, and direct single-press for fourth-row keys) beyond the basic overloaded key functionality. Users can choose the method that best suits their needs and typing style, reducing the time loss from timeouts by allowing continuous typing flow through the selector and single-press methods without requiring pause-based disambiguation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10635306B2Four row overloaded QWERTY-like keypad layout
Publication Date: 2020.04.28 SHIN JOON
  • US10635306B2 patent drawing
  • US10635306B2 patent drawing
  • US10635306B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an overloaded keypad layout which is efficient, ergonomic, unambiguous, intuitive to operate, and also familiar to the average user in its letter arrangement. More particularly, the overloaded keypad layout comprises four rows, and a space-key is positioned in the third row from bottom, and is QWERTY-like its letter arrangement. Further, the multitap input method or selector (select-the-next-letter key) input method may be employed to disambiguate the overloaded keypad layout.