Over-molded Component Assembly with Collapsible Core

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The injection molding process struggles to create complex features like undercut portions efficiently, requiring costly secondary machining operations that increase processing time and labor.

Innovation Solution

An over-molding method where an insert member with a predetermined feature, such as an undercut portion, is molded into a component part using materials like glass-filled polypropylene, eliminating the need for secondary machining by integrating the feature directly during the molding process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If secondary machining operations are used to create complex features like undercut portions, then manufacturing precision and feature complexity are improved, but production cost and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature complexityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the secondary machining operation with the primary injection molding process by integrating the undercut feature creation into the molding cavity design. The collapsible core mechanism allows the mold to dynamically change shape during ejection, combining what were previously separate operations into one integrated process, thereby eliminating additional machining steps and reducing production costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by using a collapsible core that can change its geometric configuration during the molding process. The core transitions from a rigid structure during injection to a flexible, collapsible structure during ejection, enabling the removal of complex features like undercut portions without requiring secondary machining operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If secondary machining operations are used to create complex features, then manufacturing precision is improved, but processing time and labor costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature complexityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the creation of complex features directly into the injection molding process through a specially designed collapsible core. This integration eliminates the need for separate secondary machining operations, thereby reducing total processing time while maintaining the required manufacturing precision for complex features like undercut portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The collapsible core is pre-configured within the mold cavity before injection begins. The core's ability to collapse during ejection is built into the mold design, allowing complex features to be formed during the initial molding process rather than requiring subsequent machining operations, thus saving time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If traditional molding processes are used without collapsible cores, then device complexity is reduced, but the ability to create complex features like undercut portions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold structureVSAvoidfeature creation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a collapsible core that transforms the static mold structure into a dynamic system. The core can change its geometric configuration during the ejection phase, enabling the creation of complex features like undercut portions that would be impossible with traditional rigid molds, while adding only moderate complexity to the overall device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The mold cavity is segmented into multiple sections, including the collapsible core that can independently change shape. This segmentation allows the core to collapse during ejection while the rest of the mold remains stable, enabling complex feature creation without requiring complete redesign of the entire molding system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces costs and processing time by allowing complex features to be integrally formed, enabling snap-fit joints with strong structural integrity and avoiding the need for secondary operations.

Implementation Method 1

injecting a material into the mold cavity to form an over-molded portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInjection molding:

Data Source

PatentUS9956680B2Over-molded component assembly and method of forming the same
Publication Date: 2018.05.01 APQ DEV
  • US9956680B2 patent drawing
  • US9956680B2 patent drawing
  • US9956680B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A component part has an over-molded integrally formed insert member. The insert member has a predetermined feature. In addition, an end portion of the predetermined feature is exposed and free from over-molding.