Overmolded Component Rib for Edge Definition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing overmolding processes face challenges in achieving a sharply defined edge without bleed-through, requiring precise dimensional control, high clamping forces, and limited material choices due to constraints on packing pressure and temperature.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a protruding elongate rib on the component with an overmolding tool having intersecting surfaces to reduce bleed-through, allowing reduced clamping forces, increased flexibility in dimensional precision, and higher packing pressures and temperatures, while enhancing the component's strength and rigidity at the shut-off edge.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If high clamping forces are applied at the shut-off location to prevent bleed-through, then overmolding material containment is improved, but component deformation and manufacturing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveovermolding edge definitionVSAvoidcomponent structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local reinforcement by adding a rib structure specifically at the shut-off location where bleed-through prevention is critical. This localized structural enhancement allows the component to withstand higher clamping forces without deforming, while other portions of the component maintain their original design characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The rib structure is pre-formed on the component before the overmolding process. This preliminary structural preparation ensures that when clamping forces are applied during overmolding, the reinforcement is already in place to prevent both bleed-through and component deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If dimensional tolerances of the component and overmolding tool are tightly controlled to achieve precise shut-off, then overmolding edge definition is improved, but manufacturing cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveovermolding edge definitionVSAvoiddimensional control requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rib structure provides localized geometric control at the shut-off location. This local geometric feature acts as a mechanical stop that defines the shut-off position, reducing the need for tight dimensional tolerances across the entire component and tooling assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If packing pressure and temperature are increased to improve overmolding material flow and filling, then manufacturing flexibility is improved, but bleed-through at the shut-off location increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacking process flexibilityVSAvoidovermolding edge definition
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The rib structure creates a localized reinforcement zone at the shut-off location that can withstand higher packing pressures without allowing material bleed-through. This allows the rest of the mold cavity to utilize higher pressures and temperatures for improved material flow and filling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The rib structure segments the shut-off location from the rest of the mold cavity, creating a distinct zone with different mechanical properties. This segmentation allows different packing conditions to be effectively maintained in different regions - higher pressure/temperature for filling, and reinforced containment at the shut-off zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Manufacturing precision

If the component is made stronger and more massive to withstand high clamping forces, then shut-off integrity is improved, but component weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshut-off definitionVSAvoidcomponent weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly increasing the component's mass throughout, the rib structure provides localized reinforcement only at the shut-off location. This targeted approach maintains shut-off integrity while minimizing additional weight, as the reinforcement is confined to the specific area where structural support is needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents overmolding material bleed-through, reduces material waste, and allows for more flexible manufacturing conditions while maintaining a precise edge definition, enhancing the component's strength and rigidity without excessive weight increase.

Implementation Method 1

injecting an overmolding material into a volume defined between the overmolding tool and the component that is to be overmolded, and solidifying the overmolding material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification: Freezing

Data Source

PatentUS7462077B2Overmolded electronic assembly
Publication Date: 2008.12.09 BORGWARNER US TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US7462077B2 patent drawing
  • US7462077B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A partially overmolded component having a precisely defined overmolding edge includes a component having a protruding elongate rib and the overmolding having a terminal edge abutting the protruding elongate rib. The rib defines surfaces that provide a greater area of contact between the component and an overmolding tool and a more tortuous flow path to bleed-through.