Overmolded Preform and Coating for Appliance Panels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Molded parts for household appliances face challenges in balancing technical stability and aesthetic appeal while being cost-effective and easy to manufacture, as existing solutions often require thick materials for strength, leading to undesirable flow lines and high production costs, and painting methods can be costly and prone to defects.

Innovation Solution

A molded part with a plastic coating applied over a preform using injection molding, where the preform is designed to absorb mechanical forces and the coating provides decorative functionality, allowing for the use of inexpensive materials for the preform and higher-priced plastics for the coating, enabling cost optimization and design flexibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If molded parts are made from a single material with both strength and aesthetic properties, then the material must be particularly solid to ensure strength, but this leads to increased material thickness and undesirable flow lines on the surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength propertiesVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The molded part is divided into two distinct components: a preform made from strength-optimized material and a coating made from aesthetic-optimized material. This segmentation allows each component to be designed and manufactured independently according to its specific requirements, resolving the contradiction between strength and surface quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a composite structure combining a preform (typically polypropylene or similar engineering plastic) with a coating (typically polyethylene or similar aesthetic plastic). This composite approach allows the preform to provide structural strength while the coating provides aesthetic surface quality, eliminating the need for a single material to satisfy both conflicting requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If material thickness is increased to ensure strength properties, then strength requirements are met, but aesthetic appearance deteriorates due to visible flow lines and increased production costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength propertiesVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the part into preform and coating, the invention allows the preform to be optimized for strength with appropriate thickness, while the coating adds minimal thickness for aesthetic purposes. This eliminates the need for excessive material thickness and reduces production costs associated with thicker parts and complex molding processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the material parameter strategy by selecting different materials for different functions: the preform uses materials optimized for strength and rigidity, while the coating uses materials optimized for appearance and cost-effectiveness. This parameter differentiation resolves the contradiction between strength requirements and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If metal inserts are added to provide strength properties, then strength requirements are met, but production effort and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength propertiesVSAvoidproduction effort
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces metal inserts with a composite plastic structure where the preform provides the necessary strength properties. This eliminates the complexity of multi-material assembly and reduces production effort while maintaining structural integrity through the optimized preform design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses inexpensive plastic materials for the preform that can be easily manufactured and replaced if needed, eliminating the need for expensive metal inserts and complex assembly processes. The preform is designed to be cost-effective while providing sufficient strength for the application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Shape

If painting is applied to provide aesthetic properties, then decorative appearance is achieved, but costs increase and painting may jump off when forces are applied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic propertiesVSAvoidcoating adhesion
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a composite structure where the coating is integrally bonded to the preform through the injection molding process. This eliminates the adhesion problems associated with painted surfaces, as the coating becomes an integral part of the structure rather than a separate layer that can detach under stress.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges the aesthetic function into the structural component by integrating the coating with the preform through overmolding. This creates a unified structure where the decorative coating cannot separate from the substrate, resolving the adhesion reliability issue while maintaining aesthetic appearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

5Shape

If a coating is applied over a preform using injection molding, then aesthetic properties and cost optimization are achieved, but flow lines may occur during overmolding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic propertiesVSAvoidflow front uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The preform acts as an intermediary element that controls the flow of molten plastic during overmolding. By carefully designing the preform geometry and material properties, the invention guides the plastic flow to minimize turbulence and prevent flow lines, ensuring a smooth aesthetic surface while maintaining the benefits of the coating structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution allows for the production of thin-walled, aesthetically pleasing molded parts with reduced production costs, enabling quick design changes and reuse of scrap materials, while ensuring technical stability and avoiding flow lines through optimized flow front design during overmolding.

Implementation Method 1

A molded part with a plastic coating applied over a preform using injection molding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentEP2342058B1Moulded piece for assembly on or in a domestic appliance and method
Publication Date: 2019.02.20 BOSCH SIEMENS HAUSGERATE GMBH
  • EP2342058B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2342058B1 patent drawingFigure 3~3a
  • EP2342058B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

the invention relates to a moulded piece (1) for assembly on or in a domestic appliance (1), wherein a coating (3) made from decorative plastic on at least a visible side (F) of the moulded piece (1) is moulded on a preform (2) corresponding essentially to the shape of the moulded piece (1). A separation of the function plastic ( in the preform) and the decorative plastic (in the coating ) is thus permitted.