Overrunable Test Vehicle Torque Vectoring for ADAS Crash Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current testing equipment for Advanced Driver Assistant Systems (ADAS) lacks the capability to simulate realistic crash scenarios without risking damage to the vehicle, as existing soft targets and mobile platforms are not designed to withstand the rigors of high-speed impacts and varied testing conditions.

Innovation Solution

An overrunable test vehicle equipped with a chassis, electric motors, and a control system that calculates torque and speed outputs to rotate the vehicle about an axis, allowing it to maneuver and simulate various crash scenarios while carrying soft targets, thereby enhancing the testing of ADAS systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If soft targets are used for ADAS testing, then damage to the testing vehicle is reduced, but the ability to simulate realistic crash scenarios and withstand high-speed impacts is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage to testing vehicleVSAvoidability to withstand high-speed impacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The test vehicle is divided into separate functional components: a resilient chassis that withstands impacts, a separate soft target payload that protects the testing vehicle, and independent drive mechanisms for each wheel. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function - the chassis for durability, the soft target for protection, and the drive mechanisms for maneuverability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The soft target acts as an intermediary between the testing vehicle and the test environment. It absorbs and dissipates impact forces before they reach the testing vehicle, serving as a protective buffer that enables realistic crash scenario testing without damaging the expensive ADAS-equipped vehicle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If traditional mobile platforms are used, then simplicity is maintained, but the ability to dynamically maneuver and rotate during testing is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplatform simplicityVSAvoiddynamic maneuvering capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The test vehicle employs dynamically controllable drive mechanisms with independent electric motors on each wheel, allowing real-time adjustment of speed and torque. The control system continuously calculates required motor parameters to achieve desired trajectory and rotation, enabling adaptive maneuvering during testing rather than fixed pre-programmed paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle controls its motion by dynamically changing motor parameters - specifically torque and speed outputs - based on real-time calculations. The control system adjusts these parameters to achieve precise trajectory control and rotation about a defined axis, allowing versatile testing scenarios without mechanical reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If independent electric motors are used on each wheel, then precise control of trajectory and rotation is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory control precisionVSAvoidmotor control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system implements closed-loop feedback by continuously monitoring the vehicle's position and orientation, calculating the difference between current and target states, and adjusting motor parameters accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables precise trajectory and rotation control despite the complexity of four independently controlled motors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The electric motors serve multiple functions: propulsion forward and backward, steering by differential torque application, and rotation about a vertical axis by coordinating torque across all four wheels. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate mechanical steering and rotation mechanisms, offsetting some of the control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12140499B2Overrunable test vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 HUMANETICS AUSTRIA GMBH
  • US12140499B2 patent drawing
  • US12140499B2 patent drawing
  • US12140499B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present teachings generally provide for an overrunable test vehicle for dynamic vehicle testing of advanced driver assistant systems along a driving plane. The overrunable test vehicle comprising a chassis with a first end and a second end and including a mounting area configured to receive a soft target, and defining an axis of rotation transverse to the driving plane between the first end and the second end, four drive mechanisms coupled with the chassis, each drive mechanism having an electric motor with a drive wheel, and a control system coupled with the electric motors, and configured to control speed and torque of each of the electric motors, forming a torque vector that rotates the overrunable test vehicle about the axis of rotation to a target rotation angle. The axis of rotation is a location between the two drive mechanisms that the chassis turns about when the torque vector is applied to the chassis of the overrunable test vehicle.