Ovoid Tool Head Cutting Edge Geometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drilling hard materials like titanium and cast metals poses challenges due to high load on cutting edges, leading to low machining rates and risk of chipping, especially when using manually operated tools, as chips tend to adhere and cause localized high loads.

Innovation Solution

A tool head with a three-dimensional ovoid basic shape featuring convexly curved major cutting edges and chip grooves, where the radial distance to the center axis increases to a nominal diameter and then decreases, reducing the load on cutting edges by transmitting forces along the ovoid surface, eliminating minor cutting edges and ensuring efficient force transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional drilling tools with straight or slightly curved cutting edges are used, then the tool structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the cutting load on the cutting edges is high leading to low machining rates and risk of chipping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining rateVSAvoidtool head geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting edges are designed with a pronounced convex curvature following an ovoid profile, where the radial distance from the center axis increases to a nominal diameter and then decreases to a minimum diameter. This curved geometry distributes the cutting forces more evenly along the cutting edge path, reducing peak loads and preventing chipping while enabling higher feed rates and cutting speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Productivity

If high feed rates and cutting speeds are used to increase productivity, then the machining efficiency improves, but the load on the cutting edges increases leading to chipping and reduced tool life

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting speed and feed rateVSAvoidtool life
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The ovoid-shaped cutting edges with their characteristic convex profile distribute mechanical stresses more uniformly during cutting operations. This stress distribution prevents localized overheating and excessive wear at any single point, allowing sustained high-speed cutting without premature tool failure or chipping

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting edge geometry parameters are optimized with specific radius ratios and curvature profiles. The radial distance variation from minimum to nominal diameter creates optimal cutting angles throughout the cutting path, maintaining reliable cutting performance even at elevated speeds and feed rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If manually operated drilling tools are used, then the tool can be easily applied, but chips tend to adhere to the cutting edge causing localized high loads and increasing chipping risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual operation capabilityVSAvoidchip adhesion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The continuously curved convex profile of the cutting edges prevents chip accumulation by maintaining consistent cutting geometry throughout the cut. The ovoid shape ensures chips are continuously evacuated rather than trapped in flat or angular regions, reducing adhesion and the associated localized loading that leads to chipping

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentUS9415450B2Tool head and method for machining a metallic workpiece
Publication Date: 2016.08.16 KENNAMETAL INC
  • US9415450B2 patent drawing
  • US9415450B2 patent drawing
  • US9415450B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tool head includes an ovoid basic element disposed about a center axis, at least two chip grooves formed in the basic element, and a number of major cutting edges. Each major cutting edge is disposed in a convex course along a respective chip groove of the at least two chip grooves. The major cutting edges define with their radially outermost region a nominal diameter. A radial distance from each major cutting edge to the center axis in a front, tip-side, arc portion increases up to the nominal diameter and in a rear, shank-side, arc portion decreases back down to a minimum diameter.