Oxidative Desulfurization Catalyst for Ultra-Low Sulfur Fuels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for desulfurizing hydrocarbon fuels to ultra-low sulfur levels are costly and inefficient, particularly in removing refractory sulfur-containing compounds, which are difficult to desulfurize using conventional hydrodesulfurization techniques, and existing processes often require significant capital investment and operational changes.

Innovation Solution

A process using a catalyst composed of copper, zinc, and aluminum oxides, in specific weight percentages, that facilitates oxidative and/or adsorptive desulfurization of sulfur compounds in the gaseous phase, oxidizing sulfur compounds to SO2 or converting them into sulfates, sulfites, and sulfides, allowing for the efficient removal of both labile and refractory sulfur compounds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional hydrodesulfurization techniques are used, then existing facilities can be operated, but sulfur removal efficiency is insufficient for ultra-low sulfur levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfur removal efficiencyVSAvoiddesulfurization effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical reaction parameters by introducing oxidation reactions alongside hydrodesulfurization. The oxidative desulfurization pathway converts sulfur compounds to sulfones and sulfonic acids, which are then removed by extraction, achieving ultra-low sulfur levels (below 10 ppmw) that conventional hydrodesulfurization cannot attain alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite approach combining two different chemical processes: hydrodesulfurization (catalytic hydrogenation) and oxidative desulfurization (oxidation reaction). This composite methodology leverages the strengths of both processes to achieve complete desulfurization, with the oxidation step targeting refractory sulfur compounds that resist conventional hydrodesulfurization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Manufacturing precision

If high pressure hydrotreating units are constructed, then ultra-low sulfur levels can be achieved, but capital investment costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfur content reductionVSAvoidcapital investment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the desulfurization process into two distinct stages: a first stage using existing hydrodesulfurization facilities at moderate conditions, and a second stage using oxidative desulfurization. This segmentation allows refiners to achieve ultra-low sulfur levels without completely replacing existing high-pressure hydrotreating infrastructure, thereby reducing capital investment while meeting stringent sulfur specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The oxidative desulfurization process performs preliminary oxidation of sulfur compounds before final removal via extraction. This preliminary action converts difficult-to-remove sulfur compounds into more extractable forms, enabling effective desulfurization at lower pressures and temperatures, thus avoiding the need for expensive high-pressure facility construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If existing hydrotreating facilities are upgraded, then sulfur reduction capability improves, but operational complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfur reduction capabilityVSAvoidfacility retrofitting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary extraction step that uses selective solvents to remove oxidized sulfur compounds from the hydrocarbon stream. This intermediary process acts as a bridge between hydrodesulfurization and final product specification, enabling existing facilities to achieve ultra-low sulfur levels without complex mechanical retrofits or infrastructure changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the need for complex mechanical upgrades (higher pressure vessels, enhanced reactors) with a chemical process substitution. By using oxidative desulfurization followed by liquid-liquid extraction, the system achieves equivalent or superior sulfur removal without modifying the mechanical infrastructure of existing hydrotreating facilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process effectively reduces sulfur content in hydrocarbon fuels to ultra-low levels, achieving high sulfur removal efficiency while minimizing capital and operational costs, and the catalyst can be regenerated to maintain performance.

Implementation Method 1

oxidizing sulfur compounds to SO2

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

converting them into sulfates, sulfites, and sulfides

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentEP2736636B1Method for removing sulfur compounds from gaseous hydrocarbons using catalytic compositions
Publication Date: 2020.01.08 SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO
  • EP2736636B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2736636B1 patent drawing
  • EP2736636B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A catalytic composition is disclosed, which exhibits an X-ray amorphous oxide, with a spinel formula and highly dispersed crystals of ZnO, CuO, and optionally CeO2. The composition is useful in oxidative and adsorptive processes for removing sulfur from gaseous hydrocarbons.