Oxide Catalyst Production via Particle Size Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing processes for producing oxide catalysts for vapor-phase catalytic oxidation or ammoxidation of propane or isobutane face challenges in achieving favorable yield and stability due to issues with catalyst performance, particularly related to particle size distribution and reduction ratio, especially during large-scale continuous calcining.

Innovation Solution

A process involving the preparation of a catalyst raw material mixture with specific atomic ratios of Mo, V, and Nb, followed by drying and calcining in an inert gas atmosphere, with a controlled particle size distribution to ensure a mean particle diameter of 35 to 70 μm and a content of particles ≤25 μm of 20% or less, to stabilize the catalyst performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If catalyst particles with small diameter (≤25 μm) are present in large amounts, then catalyst fluidity and fluidized bed performance are improved, but catalyst loss due to dispersion and coverage of reaction apparatus increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst fluidityVSAvoidcatalyst loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the particle size distribution parameters - specifically limiting particles ≤25 μm to 2% by mass or less and setting mean particle diameter to 35-70 μm. This quantitative parameter control resolves the contradiction by finding the optimal balance point where fluidity is sufficient while catalyst loss is minimized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of substance

If catalyst particles with larger diameter are used, then catalyst loss is reduced, but catalyst fluidity and fluidized bed performance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst lossVSAvoidcatalyst fluidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by optimizing the particle size parameters within specific ranges - mean particle diameter of 35-70 μm and limited fine particles. This parameter optimization ensures that particles are not too large to lose fluidity while not too small to cause excessive loss, achieving a balanced performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If reduction ratio is increased to improve catalyst activity, then reaction performance improves, but manufacturing precision and stability during large-scale production become difficult to control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst activityVSAvoidreduction ratio control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent addresses this contradiction by controlling multiple parameters simultaneously - particle size distribution (mean diameter 35-70 μm, fine particles ≤2% by mass) and reduction ratio (8-12%). This multi-parameter control approach ensures that high catalyst activity is achieved while maintaining manufacturing precision and stability during large-scale continuous calcining operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If particle size is reduced to improve fluidity, then fluidized state is favorable, but catalyst loss due to dispersion increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluidized stateVSAvoidcatalyst loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction through precise parameter control of particle size distribution - limiting particles ≤25 μm to 2% by mass or less while maintaining mean particle diameter of 35-70 μm. This parameter specification ensures adequate fluidity for good fluidized state while preventing excessive catalyst loss from dispersion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of oxide catalysts with improved yield and stability, effectively addressing the limitations of previous methods by ensuring favorable reaction performance and reducing catalyst loss.

Implementation Method 1

drying the catalyst raw material mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrying: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

calcining the catalyst precursor in an inert gas atmosphere

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCalcining: Heating

Implementation Method 3

a content of particles having a particle diameter of 25 μm or less is 2% by mass or less and a mean particle diameter is 35 to 70 μm, in an inert gas atmosphere

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Data Source

PatentUS9731285B2Process for producing oxide catalysts
Publication Date: 2017.08.15 ASAHI KASEI CHEM CORP

AI summary

An object of the present invention is to provide a process for producing an oxide catalyst used in a vapor-phase catalytic oxidation or vapor-phase catalytic ammoxidation reaction of propane or isobutene, which enables a catalyst demonstrating favorable yield to be stably produced. According to the present invention, there is provided a process for producing an oxide catalyst used in a vapor-phase catalytic oxidation or vapor-phase catalytic ammoxidation reaction of propane or isobutane, comprising the steps of: (i) preparing a catalyst raw material mixture containing Mo, V and Nb and satisfying the relationships of 0.1≦a≦1 and 0.01≦b≦1 when atomic ratios of V and Nb to one atom of Mo are defined as a and b, respectively; (ii) drying the catalyst raw material mixture; and (iii) calcining a particle, in which a content of the particle having a particle diameter of 25 μm or less is 20% by mass or less and a mean particle diameter is from 35 to 70 μm, in an inert gas atmosphere.