Oxide TFTs with Top and Bottom Gate Structures for OLED Displays

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional organic light emitting displays using amorphous silicon TFTs face low mobility issues, while poly-silicon TFTs require complex compensation circuits and high fabrication costs, and are challenging to apply to large substrates due to high processing costs and difficult control.

Innovation Solution

The use of oxide TFTs with both top and bottom gate structures, fabricated simultaneously in the same process, allowing for different characteristics in a single pixel, with the first TFT having an inverted staggered top gate structure and the second TFT having an inverted staggered bottom gate structure, using silicon oxide and silicon nitride gate insulation layers respectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If amorphous silicon TFTs are used, then fabrication is simple, but mobility is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication simplicityVSAvoidcarrier mobility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from amorphous silicon to oxide semiconductor, which fundamentally alters the electrical properties while maintaining compatibility with low-temperature fabrication processes. This parameter change enables high mobility without requiring complex high-temperature processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite structure combining oxide semiconductor layers with specific insulation layers (silicon oxide, silicon nitride) and metal electrodes. This composite material approach achieves both high mobility and ease of fabrication by selecting materials that work together in the low-temperature process window.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Speed

If poly-silicon TFTs are used, then mobility is increased, but threshold voltage distribution is not uniform

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarrier mobilityVSAvoidthreshold voltage uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the semiconductor material from poly-silicon to oxide semiconductor, which inherently provides more uniform electrical properties. The oxide semiconductor's amorphous structure with controlled stoichiometry eliminates the grain boundary effects that cause threshold voltage variation in poly-silicon.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a standardized oxide semiconductor layer formation process that can be uniformly applied across the entire substrate, ensuring consistent threshold voltage characteristics without requiring device-specific compensation circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If poly-silicon TFTs with compensation circuits are used, then mobility and threshold voltage uniformity are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreshold voltage uniformityVSAvoidcompensation circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the need for compensation circuits by using oxide semiconductor TFTs that inherently provide uniform threshold voltage. This removes the additional TFTs and capacitors required in poly-silicon-based compensation circuits, simplifying the overall device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The oxide semiconductor material itself provides the uniform electrical characteristics needed for reliable operation, making external compensation mechanisms unnecessary. The material's intrinsic properties serve the function that previously required additional circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Speed

If low temperature poly-silicon (LTPS) method is used, then mobility is improved, but applicability to large substrates is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarrier mobilityVSAvoidsubstrate size applicability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material system from LTPS to oxide semiconductor, which enables high mobility at lower processing temperatures. This parameter change allows uniform material deposition and processing across large substrate areas without the temperature gradients and control issues that limit LTPS scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs low-cost, low-temperature processing techniques that do not require expensive laser annealing equipment or complex temperature control systems. This makes the fabrication process economically viable and technically feasible for large-area substrate production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentEP2278618B1Organic light emitting display device and fabricating method thereof
Publication Date: 2014.09.03 SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO LTD
  • EP2278618B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP2278618B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2278618B1 patent drawingFigure 4A~4B

AI summary

An organic light emitting display includes data lines and scan lines intersecting each other, a scan driving unit for supplying a scan signal to the scan lines, a data driving unit for supplying a data signal to the data lines, and pixels defined at intersection points of the data and scan lines, each pixel having an organic light emitting diode, a first TFT with an inverted staggered top gate structure and connected to the organic light emitting diode, the first TFT including an oxide semiconductor as an active layer, and a second TFT with an inverted staggered bottom gate structure and configured to receive the scan signal from the scan lines, the second TFT including an oxide semiconductor as an active layer.