Through-port Oxy-fuel Burner Design for Glass Furnace Retrofit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Converting air-fuel firing systems in glass furnaces to oxy-fuel firing is challenging due to space limitations and structural integrity issues, leading to high pressure drops and turbulence when installing oxy-fuel burners, resulting in short flames and nozzle overheating.

Innovation Solution

A burner design with a first cooling fluid jacket and concentric oxidant and fuel conduits, featuring a bend angle of 45° to 120° and a length-to-diameter ratio of 0.8 to 7, with a convex inner surface in the oxidant conduit and a concave outer surface in the fuel conduit, to minimize turbulence and promote straight flow, along with optional oxidant staging to control flame temperature.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the oxy-fuel burner is installed through a small hole in the port neck to maintain structural integrity, then the structural integrity is preserved, but the burner design becomes complex requiring abrupt flow direction changes close to the discharge nozzle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrity of port neckVSAvoidburner design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The burner is divided into multiple sections: a vertical section for inserting through the port neck, a bend section with controlled angle (45°-120°) for flow direction change, and a horizontal discharge section. This segmentation allows the burner to navigate the spatial constraints while maintaining structural integrity and reducing flow turbulence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bend angle parameter is optimized to be between 45°-120° rather than sharp 90° bends, and the length-to-diameter ratio is controlled (0.8-7) to balance flow straightening with compact design. These parameter changes reduce turbulence and pressure drop while accommodating the small installation hole constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a long horizontal section is used to terminate the discharge nozzle, then the flow direction change is gradual, but the hole size must be large impacting structural steel and space is insufficient in the regenerator port

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow turbulence and pressure dropVSAvoidhole size in port neck
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The bend section uses a curved geometry with controlled bend angle (45°-120°) instead of sharp angular changes. This curvature gradually redirects the flow from vertical to horizontal direction, reducing turbulence and pressure drop while fitting within the limited space and small hole constraints of the regenerator port.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Volume of moving object

If the discharge nozzle is positioned close to the elbow section, then space is saved in the regenerator port, but high pressure drop and turbulence occur causing rapid mixing and combustion close to the nozzle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveburner volume in portVSAvoidnozzle overheating and flame stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The length-to-diameter ratio of the horizontal discharge section is optimized (0.8-7) to provide sufficient flow development length after the bend. This ensures that the flow is sufficiently straightened and stabilized before reaching the discharge nozzle, preventing premature combustion and nozzle overheating while maintaining compact burner dimensions for port installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design allows for efficient oxy-fuel firing with reduced turbulence and flame length, minimizing nozzle overheating and extending burner life, while maintaining structural integrity and improving glass melting efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a first cooling fluid jacket... passing a coolant through the first cooling fluid jacket

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 2

first cooling fluid jacket... to prevent overheating of the burner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConduction (thermal): Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

Turbulence causes rapid mixing and consequently combustion close to the nozzle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 4

rapid mixing and consequently combustion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 5

combustion flames for glass melting... combusting the fuel or the other fuel with the first oxidant gas to form combustion products

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 6

combustion... producing high temperature flames

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExothermic Reaction: Exothermic Reaction

Data Source

PatentEP2440500B1Through-port oxy-fuel burner
Publication Date: 2017.04.19 AIR PROD & CHEM INC
  • EP2440500B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2440500B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2440500B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A fluid-cooled through-port oxy-fuel burner for converting an air-fuel regenerator port from air-fuel combustion to oxy-fuel combustion and an associated furnace and method. The oxy-fuel burner is suitable for installing through a regenerator port neck. The burner has an elbow-like bend to accommodate the geometry of the regenerator port neck. The burner has a cooling fluid jacket, a fuel conduit, a first oxidant conduit, and optionally an oxidant staging conduit.