Portable Oxygen Concentrator Adaptive Titration Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current portable oxygen concentrators for ambulatory patients often require fixed oxygen flow prescriptions, which do not account for varying conditions such as rest, walking, or high altitude, leading to inefficient oxygen delivery and reduced battery life.

Innovation Solution

A semi-automated titration system that uses a combination of continuous flow and pulse flow modes, with sensors to determine Individualized Pulse Dose Equivalent (IPDE) settings, optimizing oxygen delivery based on patient conditions and environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If fixed prescription oxygen delivery is used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to different conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different conditionsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic oxygen delivery by transitioning from fixed prescription to adaptive flow rates. The system continuously monitors patient conditions (activity level, SpO2, respiratory rate) and automatically adjusts oxygen flow between standby, low, medium, and high modes, making the device responsive to changing physiological and environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs multiple feedback mechanisms including SpO2 monitoring, activity detection, and respiratory rate sensing. This feedback loop enables the control system to assess patient oxygenation status and environmental factors, then adjust oxygen delivery accordingly, achieving high adaptability through closed-loop control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If continuous flow mode is used, then oxygen delivery reliability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxygen delivery reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic oxygen delivery through pulse flow mode, where oxygen is delivered in synchronized bursts with patient breathing cycles rather than continuously. The system detects breath initiation and delivers oxygen pulses, reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining adequate oxygenation through timing-aligned delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between continuous flow mode (for reliability during severe hypoxemia or high activity) and pulse flow mode (for energy conservation during stable conditions). This dynamic mode selection optimizes the balance between oxygen delivery reliability and energy consumption based on real-time patient needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If adaptive oxygen delivery is implemented, then adaptability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptive oxygen deliveryVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the adaptive control into distinct operational modes (standby, low, medium, high flow rates) and separate sensing functions (activity detection, SpO2 monitoring, respiratory rate sensing). This modular segmentation manages complexity by organizing adaptive features into discrete, manageable components rather than a monolithic control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs multi-functional sensors and control algorithms that serve multiple purposes. For example, the same sensor suite monitors both activity level and respiratory rate, and the control system integrates multiple parameters to determine oxygen delivery mode, reducing overall device complexity through functional consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Use of energy by moving object

If pulse flow mode is used, then energy consumption is reduced, but oxygen delivery reliability may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidoxygen delivery reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors SpO2 levels and other physiological parameters to verify adequate oxygenation during pulse flow mode. If hypoxemia is detected or patient condition deteriorates, the feedback loop automatically transitions to continuous flow mode, ensuring reliability is maintained even when operating in energy-saving pulse mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Pulse flow delivers oxygen in synchronized bursts with patient breathing, ensuring efficient oxygen transfer during each breath. This periodic delivery timed with respiratory cycles maintains adequate oxygenation while reducing total energy consumption compared to continuous flow, achieving both reliability and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS8186346B2Self-automated titration system and method
Publication Date: 2012.05.29 CAIRE INC
  • US8186346B2 patent drawing
  • US8186346B2 patent drawing
  • US8186346B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of titration using a combination continuous flow and pulse flow portable oxygen concentration system (system) with a patient includes: a) providing the system in a continuous flow mode and titrating the patient to a predetermined blood oxygen saturation using the system at one or more predetermined conditions in the continuous flow mode; b) providing the system in a pulse flow mode and titrating the patient to the same predetermined blood oxygen saturation as step a using the system at the same one or more predetermined conditions as in step a in the pulse flow mode; c) determining an Individualized Pulse Dose Equivalent (IPDE) correlation based on data obtained from steps a and b; d) providing the system with the IPDE correlation; and e) using the IPDE correlation to operate the concentrator in a more efficient manner.