Automated Oxygen Control System for Preterm Infants

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for automatically controlling inspired oxygen delivery in preterm infants are imprecise, leading to excessive time outside target oxygen saturation ranges, and fail to account for individual variations in oxygenation responses and changing system gains over time.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and apparatus that generates output inspired oxygen concentration values by receiving oxygen saturation signals, using immediate, accumulation, and predictive control values, with non-linear compensation weighting based on the predetermined relationship between partial pressure of arterial oxygen and oxygen saturation, to maintain oxygen saturation within a target range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automated control of FiO2 is implemented, then time in target SpO2 range increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime in target SpO2 rangeVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller dynamically adapts its response characteristics by adjusting gain coefficients based on the current SpO2 level relative to the target range. The system transitions between different control modes (proportional, integral, derivative) with varying weights depending on whether SpO2 is below, within, or above the target range, making the control system flexible and responsive to changing patient conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes control parameters (gain coefficients: KP, KI, KD) based on the SpO2 error magnitude and direction. Different parameter sets are applied depending on the clinical situation (hypoxia, target range, hyperoxia), allowing the same hardware to deliver context-appropriate control actions without manual reconfiguration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If uniform automated control response is applied, then ease of operation improves, but adaptability to individual patients deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated control operationVSAvoidindividual patient response variation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system applies different control strategies to different SpO2 conditions locally. When SpO2 is below target, aggressive corrective action is taken; when within target, maintenance mode operates; when above target, conservative adjustment is applied. This localized control quality matches the clinical priorities for each oxygenation state

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its control characteristics based on real-time SpO2 measurements, transitioning between control modes as the patient's oxygenation status changes. This dynamic adaptation allows a single automated system to provide personalized control for each patient without requiring manual configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If manual adjustment of FiO2 is performed, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision of SpO2 control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidSpO2 control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors SpO2 and FiO2 measurements and uses this feedback to automatically adjust the oxygen delivery. The closed-loop control compares actual SpO2 with target range and modifies FiO2 accordingly, achieving precision that would be difficult to maintain with manual adjustment alone

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs self-adjustment based on the measured SpO2 and the control algorithm. The system serves itself by automatically detecting deviations from target and correcting FiO2 without requiring continuous manual intervention, thereby achieving precise control with reduced operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If non-linear compensation weighting is applied to accumulation control values, then SpO2 targeting effectiveness improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSpO2 targeting effectivenessVSAvoidcontrol algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies non-linear compensation by modifying the accumulation control value based on the current SpO2 level. When SpO2 is far from target, different weighting is applied compared to when SpO2 is near target. This parameter transformation improves the accuracy of SpO2 targeting by accounting for the non-linear relationship between FiO2 changes and SpO2 response

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3374014B1Method, apparatus and system for automatically controlling inspired oxygen delivery
Publication Date: 2022.11.02 UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA
  • EP3374014B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3374014B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3374014B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Provided herein is a method for automatically controlling inspired oxygen delivery, including: receiving signals representing a plurality of input oxygen saturation (SpO2) values for a patient; generating control values based on the input SpO2 values and a target SpO2 value; and generating output inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) values based on the control values and reference inspired oxygen concentration (rFiO2) values; wherein the control values include: immediate control values, generated based on the input SpO2 values, the target SpO2 value, and an immediate gain coefficient; accumulation control values, generated based on the input SpO2 values, the target SpO2 value, and an accumulation gain coefficient; and predictive control values, generated based on the input SpO2 values, the target SpO2 value, and a predictive gain coefficient; wherein the immediate gain coefficient is determined based on the rFiO2 value; and wherein a non- linear compensation weighting is applied to the accumulation control value based on a predetermined non-linear relationship between partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) and SpO2.