Oxygen PSA Adsorber Regulation via Differential Pressure Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing oxygen production units with multiple adsorbers face challenges in rapidly detecting and correcting imbalances between adsorbers, leading to suboptimal performance over time, as current methods either take too long to react or fail to identify the cause of the imbalance.

Innovation Solution

A process that continuously measures differential pressures between specific points in the adsorption cycle to detect and correct imbalances by adjusting oxygen-rich gas streams between adsorbers, using naturally occurring pressure drops within the adsorber components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional monitoring methods are used to detect imbalances between adsorbers, then the system can identify performance degradation, but the detection time is too long and corrective action is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracy of adsorber imbalanceVSAvoidresponse time for imbalance detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/physical monitoring methods with acoustic emission detection. By listening to the acoustic signals generated by gas flow through the adsorbent bed, the system can detect imbalances in real-time without mechanical contact or complex instrumentation, achieving both high precision and rapid response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces acoustic emission signals as an intermediary parameter to detect adsorber imbalance. Instead of directly measuring flow rates or pressure differentials, the system uses acoustic emissions as a mediator that correlates with adsorber performance, enabling indirect but rapid detection of imbalances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If traditional monitoring methods are used, then the system can detect performance issues, but it fails to identify the root cause of the imbalance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation about imbalance causeVSAvoidcomplexity of monitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses acoustic emission technology to replace complex multi-sensor monitoring systems. The acoustic signals provide rich information about the state of the adsorbent bed and gas flow patterns, enabling root cause identification without requiring multiple mechanical sensors or complex instrumentation arrays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows the adsorber itself to provide diagnostic information through its acoustic emissions. The adsorbent bed and gas flow system naturally generate acoustic signals that contain information about their own state, eliminating the need for external diagnostic equipment or complex monitoring infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If continuous monitoring of multiple parameters is implemented, then detection accuracy improves, but the system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring accuracyVSAvoidcomplexity of regulation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces multiple mechanical sensors and measurement devices with a single acoustic emission detection system. This single system can monitor multiple aspects of adsorber performance simultaneously (flow patterns, adsorbent state, imbalance conditions) without requiring multiple separate measurement instruments, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining or improving monitoring accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for rapid detection and correction of imbalances, ensuring symmetrical operation and optimal performance of oxygen production units by identifying and addressing the root cause of discrepancies between adsorbers, thereby maintaining high oxygen purity and production efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the invention relates to a method for regulating a unit for the production of oxygen from atmospheric air comprising N adsorbers (1, i, N), N being = or >2, each following a PSA, VSA or VPSA pressure cycle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure swing adsorption: Pressure Swing Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

the term PSA denotes any process for the purification or separation of gas employing a cyclical variation in the pressure which the adsorbent experiences

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 3

the desorption pressure is less than atmospheric pressure, typically from 50 to 400 mbar abs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDesorption: Desorption

Implementation Method 4

VSA processes, in which the adsorption is carried out substantially at atmospheric pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Data Source

PatentUS11369916B2Process for regulating an oxygen production unit by comparison of the differential pressures characteristic of different adsorbers
Publication Date: 2022.06.28 LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE
  • US11369916B2 patent drawing
  • US11369916B2 patent drawing
  • US11369916B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for regulating a unit for the production of oxygen from atmospheric air comprising N adsorbers (, N being = or >2, each according to a PSA, VSA or VPSA adsorption cycle with an offset of a phase time, the regulation process including determining a value of differential pressure characteristic of a step of the adsorption cycle for each adsorber, calculating the difference between the values of differential pressures characteristic of the various adsorbers, comparing this difference with a target value and, in the event of a dissimilarity being noted, correcting by modification of the transfer of at least one oxygen-rich gas stream between adsorbers or optionally between adsorber and storage tank.