Oxygen Saturation Prediction Model Switching for Alert Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current oxygen saturation monitoring systems often inaccurately predict whether a patient's oxygen saturation levels will return above a desaturation threshold, leading to unnecessary alerts for trivial desaturation events and missed non-trivial events.

Innovation Solution

A computing system tracks the performance of oxygen saturation prediction models and performs corrective actions, such as switching to a different model or updating the existing one, to improve prediction accuracy by using ground truth data and machine learning techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If an oxygen saturation prediction model is used to predict future oxygen saturation levels, then the number of alerts can be reduced by avoiding unnecessary notifications for trivial desaturation events, but the prediction accuracy may be insufficient leading to both false positives and false negatives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunnecessary alertsVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors actual oxygen saturation levels and compares them against predicted values to generate performance metrics. This feedback loop enables the system to evaluate prediction accuracy and identify when model performance degrades, triggering retraining operations to maintain optimal performance and reduce both false positives and false negatives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts model parameters through automated retraining using ground truth data from actual patient monitoring. By changing model parameters based on performance metrics and retraining with updated data, the system maintains high prediction accuracy while effectively filtering out trivial desaturation events to reduce unnecessary alerts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the prediction model is frequently updated to improve accuracy, then prediction performance can be enhanced, but the system complexity and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated model retraining using ground truth data collected from actual patient monitoring without requiring manual intervention. The performance metric automatically triggers retraining when degradation is detected, and the system self-manages the entire process from data collection to model updates, reducing the need for complex manual management while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-processes and stores ground truth data during normal operation, preparing training datasets in advance before they are needed for model retraining. This preliminary action reduces the computational burden during actual retraining operations and simplifies the overall system architecture by organizing data management tasks beforehand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If ground truth data is collected and used for model retraining, then prediction accuracy improves, but the time and computational resources required for data processing increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously collects and stores ground truth data during normal patient monitoring operations, transforming idle data collection into useful training material. This continuous accumulation of data eliminates the need for separate data collection phases and allows for efficient batch processing during retraining operations, reducing overall processing time while maintaining high prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20240347198A1Real-time corrective actions for oxygen saturation predictions
Publication Date: 2024.10.17 COVIDIEN LP
  • US20240347198A1 patent drawing
  • US20240347198A1 patent drawing
  • US20240347198A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, a computing system tracks, across a plurality of predictions, prediction performance of a first oxygen saturation prediction model used by one or more patient monitoring devices by comparing a respective prediction made by the first oxygen saturation prediction model to a corresponding ground truth. The computing system determines whether the prediction performance of the first oxygen saturation prediction model meets a performance metric, wherein the performance metric includes an accuracy level, a specificity level, a sensitivity level, or any combination thereof. The computing system may, in response to determining that the prediction performance of the first oxygen saturation prediction model does not meet the performance metric, cause the one or more patient monitoring devices to switch to a second oxygen saturation prediction model to predict future oxygen saturation levels of one or more patients.