Oxygenated Polymer Depolymerization Using Silane Catalysts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current chemical recycling methods for oxygenated polymer materials are inefficient due to high temperature and pressure requirements, use of expensive and polluting metal catalysts, and inability to recycle multiple polymer types simultaneously, especially in the presence of additives.

Innovation Solution

A depolymerization process involving contact between oxygenated polymer materials and a silane compound, such as those with the formula (R1, R2, R3) groups, in the presence of a catalyst, which selectively cleaves oxygen-carbonyl bonds under mild conditions, avoiding the use of metal catalysts and effectively recycling various polymer types, including those with additives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If current chemical recycling methods are used to depolymerize oxygenated polymer materials, then the polymer can be broken down into monomers or other molecules, but the process requires high temperature and high pressure which increases energy consumption and operational complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepolymerization efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the parameters of the depolymerization process by using organometallic catalysts that enable the reaction to proceed under mild conditions (lower temperature and pressure) compared to conventional methods. The catalyst system modifies the activation energy requirements, allowing efficient depolymerization without extreme thermal and pressure conditions, thus reducing energy consumption while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces an intermediary organometallic catalyst system that mediates the depolymerization reaction. This catalyst acts as a mediator between the polymer substrate and the depolymerization process, enabling bond cleavage under milder conditions. The catalyst intermediates facilitate the reaction pathway, reducing the need for high energy input while maintaining efficient conversion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If metal catalysts are used to catalyze the depolymerization reactions, then the reaction rate increases, but the metals are expensive and polluting which increases cost and environmental harm

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction rateVSAvoidenvironmental pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs organometallic catalysts that can be designed with less expensive metal centers compared to traditional precious metal catalysts. These catalysts are used in controlled amounts and can be regenerated or replaced more economically, reducing both cost and environmental persistence. The catalyst system is optimized for activity while minimizing the use of expensive and potentially polluting metals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite organometallic catalyst systems that combine metal centers with organic ligands to create catalysts with tailored properties. This composite approach allows optimization of catalytic activity while reducing reliance on expensive pure metals. The organic components can be designed for ease of removal and degradation, reducing environmental pollution while maintaining high reaction rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional recycling methods are used, then single polymer types can be processed, but the methods cannot recycle multiple polymer types simultaneously especially in the presence of additives which reduces versatility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolymer type compatibilityVSAvoidadditive interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs organometallic catalyst systems that exhibit universal activity across multiple polymer types containing oxygenated backbones (polyesters, polycarbonates, polyether carbonates). The catalyst design allows it to function with different polymer substrates and tolerate various additives present in recycled materials, providing multi-functionality that enables simultaneous or sequential processing of mixed polymer streams without requiring separate specialized catalysts for each polymer type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If high temperature and pressure conditions are applied, then depolymerization can proceed efficiently, but the operational complexity and equipment requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion efficiencyVSAvoidequipment requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the operational parameters by using organometallic catalysts that enable depolymerization to proceed at lower temperatures and pressures compared to thermal or catalytic cracking methods. This parameter modification reduces the complexity of equipment required (no need for high-pressure reactors, sophisticated temperature control systems, or specialized safety equipment) while maintaining high conversion efficiency through catalytic activity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves high conversion efficiency (up to 99%) with high purity (>90%) and selectivity, producing chemical compounds with lower oxygen content, suitable for further hydrolysis to aromatic compounds, and is adaptable to different polymer types and additives, reducing environmental impact and operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

The method consists in bringing the oxygenated polymer materials into contact with a silane compound of formula (I) in order to depolymerize the latter by selective cleavage of the oxygen-carbonyl bonds of the ester functions (-CO-O-) and of the carbonate functions (-O-CO-O-)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical Bonding: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP3233996B1Method for depolymerising oxygenated polymer materials
Publication Date: 2019.04.03 COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES
  • EP3233996B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3233996B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3233996B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention concerns a method for depolymerising oxygenated polymer materials and the use of said method in the recycling of plastic materials and the preparation of aromatic compounds that can be used as fuel, synthesis intermediates and raw materials in the construction sectors and in the petrochemical, electrical, electronic, textile, aeronautical, pharmaceutical, cosmetics and agrochemical industries. The present invention also concerns the use of aromatic compounds obtained by the method for depolymerising oxygenated polymer materials according to the invention, in the production of fuels, electronic components, plastic polymers, rubber, drugs, vitamins, cosmetic products, perfumes, food products, synthetic threads and fibres, synthetic leathers, glues, pesticides and fertilisers.