Oxygenator CO2 Transfer Control Using Blood Content Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling carbon dioxide removal in extracorporeal blood gas exchange systems are inaccurate due to the Haldane effect and require manual adjustment, increasing the risk of human error and workload.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for controlling CO2 removal by determining the difference in CO2 content between the bloodstream upstream and downstream of an oxygenator, using blood gas analysis to compensate for the Haldane effect, and automating or manually adjusting CO2 addition to achieve precise CO2 removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual adjustment of CO2 addition is used to minimize CO2 removal, then CO2 removal can be controlled, but measurement precision is reduced due to the Haldane effect and human error increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 removal measurement accuracyVSAvoidcontrol reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously measures CO2 content in the bloodstream upstream and downstream of the oxygenator, compares these values, and automatically adjusts CO2 addition to the sweep gas flow based on the measured difference. This closed-loop feedback mechanism eliminates manual adjustment errors and compensates for the Haldane effect by relying on actual measurements rather than assumptions about CO2 fraction equality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment of CO2 addition with an automated control system that uses blood gas analysis and computer-controlled regulation. This substitution of manual operation with automated measurement and control systems improves both measurement precision and reliability by eliminating human error and the limitations of manual assessment methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If manual adjustment of CO2 addition is performed, then CO2 removal can be controlled, but ease of operation deteriorates due to increased manual workload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol operation easeVSAvoidcontrol reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-adjustment by automatically measuring CO2 content in the blood, calculating the appropriate CO2 addition level, and regulating the CO2 flow to the sweep gas without clinician intervention. This self-service capability dramatically improves ease of operation while simultaneously enhancing reliability through consistent automated control that eliminates manual errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If CO2 fraction upstream equals CO2 fraction downstream assumption is used, then control simplicity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to the Haldane effect

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 content measurement accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of relying on the simplified assumption that CO2 fractions are equal upstream and downstream, the system implements direct feedback measurement of CO2 content in the bloodstream at both locations. This measured feedback provides accurate information about actual CO2 removal, compensating for the Haldane effect while maintaining control effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control parameter from comparing CO2 fractions in the sweep gas (which is affected by the Haldane effect) to measuring CO2 content directly in the bloodstream upstream and downstream. This parameter change from gas phase measurement to blood phase measurement provides accurate CO2 removal assessment regardless of the Haldane effect, improving measurement precision without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides accurate and automated control of CO2 removal, reducing human error and workload, allowing for reliable evaluation of ventilatory treatment and lung function.

Implementation Method 1

an oxygenator that serves as an artificial lung by removing CO2 and adding oxygen to the blood before the oxygen-enriched blood is returned to the circulatory system of the patient. The removal of CO2 and the addition of oxygen is achieved by sweeping an oxygen-containing sweep gas flow through the oxygenator, allowing gas exchange between the blood and the sweep gas to take place over the oxygenator membrane.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas exchange: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

this assumption is often erroneous due to, e.g., the so called Haldane effect, according to which oxygenation of blood causes displacement of CO2 from haemoglobin, thereby increasing the removal of CO2.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHaldane effect:

Data Source

PatentUS20250345550A1Control of carbon dioxide transfer in oxygenator for extracorporeal blood gas exchange
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 MAQUET CRITICAL CARE
  • US20250345550A1 patent drawing
  • US20250345550A1 patent drawing
  • US20250345550A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling carbon dioxide [CO2] removal in a device (5) for extracorporeal blood gas exchange is disclosed. The device (5) comprises an oxygenator (21) including a membrane (23) acting as a gas-liquid barrier enabling CO2 transfer between a bloodstream and a sweep gas flow through the oxygenator. The method comprises the steps of adding (S1) CO2 to the sweep gas flow upstream of the oxygenator (21) to control a degree of CO2 removal from the bloodstream by the oxygenator, determining (S2) a measure of CO2 removal by the oxygenator (21) based on a difference [ΔCCO2blood] between a measure of a pre-oxygenator content of CO2 [CCO2in] in the bloodstream upstream of the oxygenator (21) and an estimate of a post-oxygenator content of CO2 [CCO2out] in the bloodstream downstream of the oxygenator (21), and utilizing (S3) the measure of CO2 removal for improved regulation of the CO2 addition to the sweep gas flow.