Ozone Decontamination Control for Enclosed Spaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Enclosed spaces, particularly public spaces, require effective decontamination methods to destroy viruses and bacteria in the air and on surfaces, but existing systems lack efficient and automated solutions for achieving this.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method involving ozone generators, sensors, and a control unit to introduce ozone into enclosed spaces, maintaining a predetermined ozone concentration for decontamination, and then dissipating it when unoccupied to ensure safety and effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If ozone is introduced into an enclosed space to decontaminate viruses and bacteria, then decontamination effectiveness is improved, but safety risks increase due to potential ozone exposure to occupants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecontamination effectivenessVSAvoidozone exposure risk to occupants
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs decontamination cycles during unoccupied periods before occupants return. The control unit schedules ozone generation to occur only when the space is unoccupied, eliminating exposure risk while maintaining decontamination effectiveness. Occupancy sensors or timers trigger the ozone generator to operate during safe time windows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Ozone sensors continuously monitor the enclosed space and provide feedback to the control unit. When ozone concentration reaches target levels for decontamination, the system automatically shuts off the ozone generator. This feedback mechanism ensures sufficient decontamination while preventing excessive ozone accumulation that would pose safety risks to occupants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If manual decontamination methods are used, then system complexity is reduced, but productivity and labor costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecontamination efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors ozone concentration levels and controls the ozone generator without human intervention. The control unit receives feedback from ozone sensors and autonomously adjusts generator operation to maintain optimal decontamination levels, eliminating the need for manual monitoring and control while improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual decontamination processes are replaced with an automated electronic control system that uses sensors and microcontrollers to manage ozone generation. This substitution of manual mechanical operations with automated electronic control increases productivity while the modular design keeps system complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If ozone concentration is increased to improve decontamination, then pathogen destruction effectiveness increases, but safety hazards increase for occupied spaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepathogen destruction effectivenessVSAvoidsafety hazards in occupied spaces
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

High-concentration ozone decontamination is performed in advance during unoccupied periods. The system generates elevated ozone levels to effectively destroy pathogens on surfaces and in air, then allows complete dissipation before occupants return, achieving both high effectiveness and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Ozone sensors provide real-time feedback on concentration levels, enabling the control unit to precisely regulate ozone generation. When target concentrations for effective pathogen destruction are reached, the system automatically shuts off the generator, preventing excessive ozone accumulation that would create safety hazards upon occupant return.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively decontaminates enclosed spaces by maintaining a controlled ozone level to neutralize viruses and bacteria, reducing the risk of pathogen spread with reduced labor and costs, as ozone levels dissipate quickly when unoccupied.

Implementation Method 1

The decontamination system employs at least one ozone generator located within an enclosed space

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOzone generation: Ozone

Implementation Method 2

at least one ozone sensor for measuring ozone concentration within the enclosed space

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOzone detection: Ozone

Implementation Method 3

the object of destroying viruses and bacteria

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS12011513B1Apparatus and method for decontaminating an enclosed space
Publication Date: 2024.06.18 AMERICAN WATER PURIFICATION
  • US12011513B1 patent drawing
  • US12011513B1 patent drawing
  • US12011513B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A decontamination system employs at least one ozone generator located within an enclosed space, at least one ozone sensor and a control system for controlling the operation of the at least one ozone. During a decontamination cycle, the at least one ozone generator is operated to disperse ozone within the enclosed space until the at least one ozone sensor indicates that a desired decontamination ozone level has been reached.