Ozone Generator Resource Optimization via Dynamic Power and Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ozone generators face inefficiencies in operating resource consumption, particularly in applications with variable ozone demand, leading to high costs due to constant power and gas usage, even when only a fraction of the rated power is needed.

Innovation Solution

A method that reduces both electrical power and ozone concentration, while also adjusting gas flow to optimize operating resource consumption, using a characteristic performance map to determine minimum power and flow rates that achieve the required generator power at lower costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the electrical power is reduced to match the variable ozone demand (operating below rated power), then operating costs decrease, but the ozone concentration in the emitting gas decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating costsVSAvoidozone concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by simultaneously adjusting multiple operating parameters (electrical power, gas flow rate) rather than changing a single parameter. This allows the system to achieve cost reduction while maintaining acceptable ozone concentration levels by finding optimal combinations of parameters in the expanded operational parameter space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic operation by expanding the operational parameter space and allowing continuous adjustment of electrical power and gas flow rate based on variable demand. This enables the ozone generator to adapt to changing ozone requirements while optimizing resource consumption, moving away from static rated power operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the gas flow is increased to maintain constant electrical power, then the total ozone volume increases, but the ozone concentration in the gas decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal ozone volumeVSAvoidozone concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by changing multiple parameters simultaneously - adjusting both gas flow rate and electrical power together. This allows the system to achieve desired total ozone volume while maintaining acceptable concentration levels through coordinated parameter adjustment, rather than holding electrical power constant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by allowing the system to operate with sub-optimal ozone concentration in exchange for achieving the required total ozone volume and reducing overall resource consumption. The focus is on meeting the primary requirement (total ozone volume) while accepting partial compromise on concentration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Quantity of substance

If the gas flow is reduced to increase ozone concentration, then the ozone concentration increases, but the total ozone volume decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveozone concentrationVSAvoidtotal ozone volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by simultaneously adjusting gas flow rate and electrical power. This allows the system to achieve the desired total ozone volume while maintaining acceptable concentration levels through coordinated parameter changes, rather than relying solely on gas flow reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If the ozone generator is designed for peak load capacity, then it can meet maximum demand, but it operates at less than full capacity during normal conditions, reducing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak load capacityVSAvoidoperating efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by enabling continuous adjustment of operating parameters (electrical power, gas flow rate) based on actual demand. This allows the ozone generator to operate efficiently at variable loads while maintaining the capability to meet peak demand, resolving the contradiction between peak capacity and operating efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes to expand the operational parameter space, allowing the system to optimize efficiency at different load levels. By adjusting electrical power and gas flow rate together, the system can maintain high efficiency across a range of operating conditions while retaining peak load capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230193491A1Method for optimizing consumption of the operating resources of ozone generators
Publication Date: 2023.06.22 PROMINENT GMBH
  • US20230193491A1 patent drawing
  • US20230193491A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention comprises a method for optimizing the consumption of an operating resource of ozone generators in which an oxygen-containing gas is conveyed through an existing gap between two conductors, between which there is a potential difference, wherein the ozone generator has a generator rated power Pn that is achieved when the ozone generator has an electrical power Pel=Pel,max coupled and the oxygen-containing gas is conveyed through the gap with a gas flow φN, such that the gas that flows through has an ozone concentration cozN, wherein the method comprises the following steps:A) specify a required generator power Ptarget,B) if 0<Ptarget<Pn, reduce both the electrical power Pel=Pel,actual<Pel,max and the ozone concentration coz,actual<cozN, wherein Pel,actual and coz is selected in order to achieve the required generator power Ptarget.