P+ Guard Ring Layout for SEL Mitigation in ICs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Single event latch-up (SEL) in semiconductor structures of integrated circuits leads to abnormal high-current states, potentially damaging the device by causing heat generation and metal migration, which existing technologies have not adequately addressed.

Innovation Solution

A p-type device-centric approach is implemented, where a p+ guard ring is formed around p-type devices or clusters of p-type devices, with an n+ guard ring inside and an additional n+ guard ring between the n+ and p+ guard rings, reducing the likelihood of latch-up by decoupling parasitic bipolar junctions and minimizing the layout size and complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional SEL mitigation techniques are used with multiple guard rings around both p-type and n-type devices, then SEL protection is improved, but device complexity and layout size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSEL protectionVSAvoidlayout complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by placing guard rings selectively only around p-type devices rather than uniformly around all devices. This is achieved through the method of forming a p-type well in an n-type substrate, forming p-type devices in the p-type well, and then forming guard rings around selected p-type devices. This selective approach maintains SEL protection where most needed while reducing overall complexity and layout size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the guard ring protection mechanism from being a universal requirement for all devices and applies it only where necessary - specifically around p-type devices. By removing the unnecessary guard rings around n-type devices, the patent reduces layout complexity while maintaining adequate SEL mitigation through the p-type device-centric approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If multiple guard rings are placed around all devices, then SEL protection is improved, but manufacturing process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSEL protectionVSAvoidmanufacturing process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process implements local quality by configuring guard rings only around p-type devices during fabrication. The process involves forming a p-type well in an n-type substrate, creating p-type devices within the well, and then selectively forming guard rings around these p-type devices. This localized approach simplifies the manufacturing process compared to uniformly protecting all devices while maintaining effective SEL mitigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If larger layout size is used to accommodate multiple guard rings, then SEL protection is improved, but area utilization decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSEL protectionVSAvoidlayout area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts unnecessary guard ring structures from the layout by removing them around n-type devices. By maintaining guard rings only around p-type devices in the p-type well structure, the patent reduces the total layout area occupied by guard rings while preserving SEL protection effectiveness. This extraction of redundant elements optimizes area utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively mitigates SEL by reducing the gain of parasitic SCR structures, preventing continuous current flow and thus protecting the integrated circuit from damage, while simplifying the design and reducing unnecessary guard rings.

Implementation Method 1

reducing the likelihood of latch-up by decoupling parasitic bipolar junctions and minimizing the layout size and complexity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectParasitic bipolar junction decoupling:

Data Source

PatentUS10811493B2Single event latch-up (SEL) mitigation techniques
Publication Date: 2020.10.20 XILINX INC
  • US10811493B2 patent drawing
  • US10811493B2 patent drawing
  • US10811493B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples described herein provide for single event latch-up (SEL) mitigation techniques. In an example, a semiconductor structure includes a semiconductor substrate, a p-type transistor having p+ source/drain regions disposed in a n-doped region in the semiconductor substrate, an n-type transistor having n+ source/drain regions disposed in a p-doped region in the semiconductor substrate, a n+ guard ring disposed in the n-doped region and laterally around the p+ source/drain regions of the p-type transistor, and a p+ guard ring disposed laterally around the n-doped region. The p+ guard ring is disposed between the p-type transistor and the n-type transistor.