P-Type Layer Interference Tuning for Low-Loss Optoelectronics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optoelectronic devices, such as LEDs and laser diodes, face challenges in reducing absorption losses and improving optical efficiency without increasing operating voltage, particularly due to internal reflection and interference issues in their heterostructures.

Innovation Solution

The heterostructure design includes a p-type layer stack with a thickness configured for constructive interference, featuring an electron blocking layer, a p-type interlayer, and a reflective p-type contact, which promotes the extraction of light by aligning the phases of emitted and reflected radiation, thereby reducing optical losses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the heterostructure uses conventional layer thicknesses, then the device structure is simple, but optical losses increase due to destructive interference and internal reflection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical lossVSAvoidheterostructure design
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the thickness of the p-type layer stack to satisfy the constructive interference condition: thickness = m×λ/(2×n_effective), where m is an integer, λ is the emission wavelength, and n_effective is the effective refractive index. This parameter optimization transforms the optical properties of the heterostructure, converting potential destructive interference into constructive interference that enhances light extraction efficiency and reduces optical losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of internal reflection and interference into a beneficial effect. By intentionally designing the p-type layer thickness to create constructive interference, the patent transforms what would normally be considered optical losses (internal reflection and interference) into a mechanism that enhances light extraction. The reflective contact that normally causes destructive interference is instead utilized to create constructive interference patterns that improve overall device performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Productivity

If the p-type layer thickness is optimized for constructive interference, then light extraction is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight extraction efficiencyVSAvoidlayer thickness control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes a clear mathematical relationship between layer thickness and optical performance through the constructive interference condition. This provides manufacturers with a precise target parameter (thickness = m×λ/(2×n_effective)) that can be controlled during fabrication. By defining specific thickness ranges that satisfy this condition, the patent translates complex optical requirements into manufacturable parameter specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If conventional heterostructure designs are used, then device complexity is low, but optical efficiency decreases due to absorption losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabsorption lossVSAvoidp-type layer stack configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the p-type contact structure into a multi-layer stack comprising an electron blocking layer, a p-type interlayer, and a reflective contact layer. This segmentation allows each layer to perform its specific function: the electron blocking layer prevents carrier leakage, the p-type interlayer provides hole transport, and the reflective contact layer creates the necessary optical interference. This divided structure achieves superior optical efficiency compared to a simple conventional contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The p-type layer stack is designed to simultaneously fulfill multiple functions: electrical contact, carrier blocking, and optical interference control. By integrating these functions into a single multi-layer structure, the patent reduces the need for separate components and achieves improved optical efficiency without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the reliability and output of optoelectronic devices by minimizing absorption losses and optimizing light extraction, maintaining the operating voltage at current levels.

Implementation Method 1

a thickness of the set of p-type layers is configured to promote constructive interference between light reflected from the reflective structure and light emitted from a topmost quantum well of the active region in a direction toward the set of n-type layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConstructive interference: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS20240421245A1Optoelectronic Device with Reduced Optical Loss
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 SENSOR ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20240421245A1 patent drawing
  • US20240421245A1 patent drawing
  • US20240421245A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An optoelectronic device with reduced optical losses is disclosed. The optoelectronic device includes a set of n-type layers; an active region that includes at least one quantum well configured to generate radiation at a peak emitted wavelength and at least one barrier; and a set of p-type layers disposed on the active region. A reflective layer can be disposed on the set of p-type layers. The set of p-type layers can included an electron blocking region, and a thickness of the electron blocking region can be 80% or less than a thicking of the set of p-type layers. Additionally, a thickness of the at least one barrier can be 20% or less than the thickness of the set of p-type layers.