P2P Digital Rights Management with Blockchain Transaction Logging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital rights management (DRM) systems face challenges in secure, verifiable, and efficient data exchange between and across networks, particularly in terms of transactional transparency and enhanced security.

Innovation Solution

A peer-to-peer (P2P) network system utilizing a processor, memory, and blockchain technology for secure data exchange, including a daisy chain mechanism for data redistribution, transparent logging, and smart contracts to manage and enforce licensing agreements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional centralized DRM systems are used, then data exchange can be controlled, but transactional transparency and security are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransactional transparencyVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a blockchain network as an intermediary layer between content providers and consumers. This decentralized ledger acts as a neutral mediator that records all licensing transactions immutably, providing transparency without requiring trust in any single centralized authority. The smart contracts deployed on the blockchain automatically enforce licensing terms while maintaining verifiable transaction records accessible to all parties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional centralized DRM infrastructure (servers, databases, authentication systems) with a cryptographic-based blockchain system. Instead of relying on mechanical centralized control mechanisms, the system uses cryptographic proofs, digital signatures, and consensus algorithms to establish trust and enforce rights, fundamentally substituting the underlying mechanical architecture with a decentralized cryptographic protocol.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If decentralized P2P network is implemented, then security and transparency are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata exchange securityVSAvoidnetwork architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the blockchain network to serve multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as a distributed ledger for transaction recording, a decentralized authentication system through digital signatures, a smart contract execution platform, and a peer-to-peer communication network. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized components, thereby managing complexity while providing comprehensive security and transparency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the DRM system into independent modular components: content encryption modules, license generation modules, smart contract modules, and verification modules. Each peer device runs specific segments of the system independently, and the blockchain network coordinates these segments through standardized protocols. This segmentation allows the complex P2P system to be built from manageable, interchangeable modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If smart contracts are used for licensing, then automated enforcement is achieved, but computational overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelicensing efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements smart contracts that are pre-configured with all licensing terms, rules, and enforcement logic before deployment. Once deployed, these contracts automatically execute licensing operations without requiring real-time computational analysis or human intervention. The preliminary setup phase consolidates the computational complexity, allowing efficient automated execution during actual licensing transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses cryptographic hashing to create compact representations (copies) of complex licensing data and verification logic. Instead of transmitting or processing entire licensing agreements and rule sets during each transaction, the system uses hash values and digital signatures that serve as efficient copies, dramatically reducing computational overhead while maintaining verification integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If encryption is applied to datasets, then security is enhanced, but access efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoiddata access speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements selective encryption where only specific portions of datasets that contain sensitive or licensed information are encrypted, while other portions remain in plaintext for efficient access. The encryption scope and location are determined by the licensing terms and data classification, allowing the system to maximize security for protected content while maintaining fast access for unprotected content, thereby optimizing the security-speed tradeoff locally rather than globally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12423389B2Systems and methods of digital rights management
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 PEER DATA INC
  • US12423389B2 patent drawing
  • US12423389B2 patent drawing
  • US12423389B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for digital rights management includes a peer-to-peer (P2P) network, a processor, and a memory, including instructions stored thereon, which when executed by the processor, cause the system to: transmit a first request for a dataset by a first device to a second device on the P2P network; authenticate the first request at the second device based on a predefined rule; generate an encrypted dataset by the second device based on the authenticated first request; access the encrypted dataset at the first device using a decryption key; and transmit a second request for the dataset by a third device to the first device on the P2P network.