P2P Overlay Network Peer Arrangement for Reduced Playback Delays

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing P2P video streaming networks face inefficiencies due to inflexible overlay structures and high setup costs, leading to suboptimal bandwidth utilization and increased playback delays, as peers with varying upload capacities are not optimally arranged in the distribution layers.

Innovation Solution

A method and device for arranging peers in a hierarchical order within the P2P overlay network based on their upload capacity, placing high-capacity peers closer to the streaming source to reduce the number of distribution layers and minimize playback delays, while penalizing failing peers and adjusting for NAT compatibility and other parameters to maintain system robustness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If peers are arranged in traditional P2P overlay distribution layers, then the network structure is simple to implement, but the total number of distribution layers increases leading to increased playback delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplayback delaysVSAvoidoverlay network structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the arrangement parameter of peers from random or flat distribution to hierarchical arrangement based on upload capacity. By sorting peers according to their upload capabilities and placing them in specific distribution layers, the system optimizes the number of hops data must traverse, thereby reducing playback delays without requiring fundamentally new network structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different positions in the overlay network based on individual peer characteristics (upload capacity). High-capacity peers are strategically placed in distribution layers closer to the source, while lower-capacity peers are placed further away. This localized optimization of peer placement reduces overall network latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If high-capacity peers are placed in distribution layers far from the streaming source, then the overlay structure is easier to maintain, but bandwidth utilization becomes suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth utilizationVSAvoidoverlay configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the positional parameter of peers in the distribution layers based on their upload capacity parameter. By sorting peers according to their bandwidth capabilities and arranging them hierarchically, the system ensures that high-capacity peers are positioned where they can maximize their contribution to overall bandwidth utilization, directly improving system productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If the number of distribution layers is reduced, then playback delays are minimized, but the network becomes less resilient to failures and churn

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplayback delaysVSAvoidnetwork resilience
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the number of distribution layers by arranging peers in a hierarchical structure that minimizes hops while maintaining redundancy. By carefully controlling the arrangement parameter of peers across layers, the system achieves fewer distribution layers (reducing delays) while preserving network resilience through strategic peer placement and alternative routing paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If peers with varying upload capacities are randomly arranged, then the overlay setup is simpler, but overall system performance is suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidpeer arrangement mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent improves system performance by changing the arrangement parameter of peers from random to hierarchical based on upload capacity. The system sorts peers according to their bandwidth capabilities and assigns them to specific distribution layers, creating an optimized overlay structure that maximizes data flow efficiency and overall system productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different positions in the distribution hierarchy based on individual peer upload capacities. Each peer is evaluated and placed in the most appropriate layer according to its capabilities, optimizing local bandwidth utilization throughout the network and improving overall system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8806049B2P2P-engine
Publication Date: 2014.08.12 PEERIALISM
  • US8806049B2 patent drawing
  • US8806049B2 patent drawing
  • US8806049B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A peer-to-peer (P2P) overlay network, which comprises a streaming source and a plurality of peers arranged in distribution layers, is arranged such that the total number of distribution layers of the overlay network is reduced. First, the upload capacity of each individual peer is determined and a maximum number of overlay peers to which said each individual peer can upload is calculated. Then, the peers are arranged in hierarchical order in relation to the streaming source on the basis of the maximum number of peers to which each individual peer can upload data. A higher number results in the individual peer being arranged in a distribution layer closer to the streaming source while a lower number results in the individual peer being arranged in a distribution layer further from the streaming source. Thus, the total number of distribution layers of the overlay network is reduced.