P2P Request Rejection via Status Control Feedback
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Wireless peer-to-peer networks lack mechanisms for efficient rejection and cancellation of request messages, leading to delays and inefficiencies due to the need for user intervention and timeout periods, which can impact overall communication efficiency.
Innovation Solution
A status control mechanism is implemented in peer-to-peer systems that allows for the rejection and cancellation of request messages, enabling direct communication between devices without the need for user input and reducing waiting times by using status code control attribute information.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of operation
If wireless peer-to-peer networks use decentralized architecture for direct device communication, then user convenience and flexibility are improved, but control measures for message transfer efficiency deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements a feedback mechanism where receiving devices send status control information back to requesting devices to indicate whether requests are rejected or cancelled. This feedback loop enables efficient control in decentralized P2P networks by allowing devices to immediately communicate their response status without waiting for timeouts or user intervention, thus resolving the contradiction between decentralized operation and message transfer efficiency
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces status control information as an intermediary mechanism that mediates communication between P2P devices. This intermediary carries rejection and cancellation status between devices, enabling controlled message transfer efficiency in decentralized networks without requiring centralized control or prolonged user intervention
2Reliability
If timeout periods and user intervention are used for request rejection and cancellation, then device control is improved, but communication delays increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by implementing automatic rejection and cancellation mechanisms that act before timeout periods expire. Devices are pre-configured to automatically send status control information when requests should be rejected or cancelled, eliminating the need to wait for timeout periods and removing the requirement for user intervention, thus reducing communication delays while maintaining reliable device control
3Productivity
If status control mechanism is implemented for request rejection and cancellation, then message transfer efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies universality by designing a multi-functional status control information structure that handles both rejection and cancellation operations within a single unified mechanism. This universal approach allows the same status control framework to manage multiple types of request terminations, improving message transfer efficiency without proportionally increasing device complexity through separate specialized mechanisms for each function
Data Source
AI summary
Systems, apparatuses, and methods are directed to a first peer-to-peer (P2P) enabled device configured to wirelessly transmit a first request message and a second P2P-enabled device configured to wirelessly receive the first request message. In response to receiving the first request message, the second P2P-enabled device wirelessly transmits a second request message to the first P2P-enabled device, and if the first request message is rejected by the second P2P-enabled device, the second request message includes status control information indicating that the first request message is rejected. In addition, if the first request message is to be cancelled, the first P2P-enabled device transmits another request message to the second P2P-enabled device with status control information indicating that the first request message has been cancelled.