P2P Collaboration Network Topology for Low-Latency Load Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing peer-to-peer (P2P) collaboration networks face limitations in scalability and latency due to a limited number of connections, particularly in multiple latency-sensitive collaboration scenarios like Audio Fusion, where conventional Wi-Fi networks struggle to handle more than four devices efficiently.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a software service on IHSs that dynamically restructures P2P network topologies based on participant counts, allowing redirection of new devices to satellite hosts and enabling multiple hosts to process audio streams, using Wi-Fi Direct connections to optimize connectivity and reduce latency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional Wi-Fi networks are used for P2P collaboration, then simple network setup is achieved, but the number of supported devices is limited to four or fewer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of supported devicesVSAvoidnetwork topology structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The network is segmented into multiple topologies (first P2P topology and second P2P topology) with different device capacity limits. When the first topology reaches its device limit, the system segments the network by introducing a second topology with additional hosts, allowing new devices to join without disrupting existing connections. This resolves the contradiction by enabling network expansion while maintaining manageable topology structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If more devices are added to P2P network, then collaboration scalability is improved, but network latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of connected devicesVSAvoidnetwork latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The network dynamically transitions between different P2P topologies based on device count. When devices are added, the system dynamically reconfigures the network from a first topology to a second topology with additional hosts, optimizing the network structure for the current device count. This dynamic adaptation allows the network to scale while maintaining low latency by selecting the appropriate topology configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If dual-radio solutions are implemented, then network performance is improved, but device cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork processing capacityVSAvoidhardware configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The network functionality is segmented across multiple devices rather than requiring enhanced hardware in each device. By creating multiple hosts in the second P2P topology, the system distributes network processing capacity across the network infrastructure rather than concentrating it in individual dual-radio devices. This resolves the contradiction by achieving high productivity through network architecture rather than hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12550001B2Systems and methods for load balancing connections for collaboration networking
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 DELL PROD LP
  • US12550001B2 patent drawing
  • US12550001B2 patent drawing
  • US12550001B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for load balancing connections for collaboration networking are described. In an illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, a first Information Handling System (IHS) may include: a processor; and a memory coupled to the processor, where the memory includes program instructions store thereon that, upon execution by the processor, cause the first IHS to: establish at least one peer-to-peer (P2P) connection with at least a second IHS of a P2P network; obtain a request to join the P2P network from a third IHS while the P2P network is configured with a first P2P network topology; and direct the third IHS to join the P2P network, where, at least after the join, the P2P network is configured with a second P2P network topology.