P300 Concealed Information Detection Using Interleaved Probe and Target Trials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting concealed information using event-related potentials (ERPs) are inadequate for real-world applications, particularly in criminal investigations, as they rely on complex procedures and are not suited for detecting guilty knowledge or recognition processes involving specific items like murder weapons or stolen objects, and they do not provide clear dichotomous results.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a computer-based method that measures and evaluates event-related potentials (ERPs) generated by a subject in response to repeatedly presented stimuli, including both significant and non-significant information, to detect undisclosed prior cognition or actions, while being resistant to counter-measures designed to thwart deception detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If complex ERP procedures are used to detect concealed information, then measurement precision may be improved, but device complexity and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidprocedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The test protocol is segmented into distinct trial types (probe trials with rare stimuli and target trials with common stimuli) that are presented in an interleaved sequence. This segmentation allows the system to separately measure P300 responses to rare stimuli while maintaining subject engagement through frequent target trials, thereby simplifying the overall procedure while preserving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic presentation of rare stimuli at fixed probability intervals (e.g., 20% probability) within a structured trial sequence. This periodic action creates consistent P300 responses that are easier to detect and measure, reducing procedure complexity while maintaining detection accuracy through predictable neural response patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Measurement precision

If traditional ERP methods are used, then measurement precision may be improved, but ease of operation and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidtesting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous subject engagement through interleaved target trials that require consistent behavioral responses, while simultaneously collecting P300 data from rare stimuli. This continuity eliminates idle time between measurements and improves testing efficiency without sacrificing detection accuracy, as both trial types contribute to the overall assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The same trial structure serves multiple functions: target trials maintain subject attention and provide baseline P300 measurements, while probe trials with rare stimuli detect concealed information. This multi-functionality increases productivity by eliminating the need for separate calibration and testing phases, while maintaining measurement precision through integrated data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If separate probe and target trials are used, then measurement precision may be improved, but device complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveP300 detection accuracyVSAvoidtesting duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges probe trials and target trials into a single interleaved test sequence, where both trial types are presented alternately rather than in separate blocks. This merging reduces the total number of trials needed by continuously collecting data from both rare and common stimuli, thereby decreasing testing duration while maintaining P300 detection accuracy through consistent measurement conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for reliable detection of concealed information by identifying P300 brain waves associated with rare or meaningful stimuli, providing clear yes or no results regarding a subject's familiarity or knowledge of specific items, thus enhancing the accuracy of deception detection and guilty knowledge assessment.

Implementation Method 1

an electroencephalograph (EEG) is a known device which senses, measures and records brain waves of a subject person by sensing spontaneous electrical potentials, typically referred to as EEG, and also by sensing event related potential ('ERP')

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvent-related potential (ERP):

Implementation Method 2

Significance has been established when brain waves of large amplitudes occur at time intervals of about 300 msec (milliseconds) or more after the eliciting event. One class of brain wave produced under such circumstances is known as P300 brain wave or, sometimes, more simply, as the P3 brain wave.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectP300 brain wave:

Data Source

PatentUS7376459B2System and method for P300-based concealed information detector having combined probe and target trials
Publication Date: 2008.05.20 BRAINWAVE SCIENCE INC
  • US7376459B2 patent drawing
  • US7376459B2 patent drawing
  • US7376459B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method of deception detection is disclosed wherein T trials are combined with P and I trials. Denoted as the complex trial (CT) protocol, in one embodiment, the beginning of each trial is indicated by the onset of a stimulus which is either a P or I, which remains on the display terminal for particular random (unpredictable to the subject) time period. At the expiration of the period, the stimulus remains on the screen, but is altered/augmented in some way, such as by color change. The subject has been instructed that if the color change is to green, for example, the trial is a target trial, and the subject should make a “yes” (target) response. If the color is anything else (e.g., red, blue, yellow), the subject must give a “no” (non-target) response. Accordingly, in the CT protocol, the subject must attend even more intensely than in prior 3-stimulus protocols to the probe-irrelevant attribute (i.e., the color change) of the initially presented stimulus, because the target/non-target attribute is brief and its appearance is made unpredictable via the randomly varying property of the presentation time period. That is, the subject must keep fixating on the white stimulus, or else he will miss the target/non-target presentation. He is aware, as before, that missed targets and non-targets will betray lack of cooperation with the procedure. Further, the disclosed system and method promotes maintained vigilant attentiveness thereby reducing the effectiveness of countermeasures.