Pacemaker Algorithm Prevents Atrial Fibrillation via Simultaneous Pacing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current implantable cardiac rhythm management devices, such as pacemakers, often induce Competitive Atrial Pacing (CAP), which can trigger dangerous arrhythmias like atrial fibrillation, and lack effective algorithms for terminating repetitive non-reentrant ventriculo-atrial synchrony, affecting up to 23.4% of patients with pacemakers.

Innovation Solution

A novel algorithm that delivers pacing stimuli simultaneously to the atrium and ventricle after a prolonged waiting period, avoiding the vulnerable period and terminating retrograde conduction, thereby preventing atrial fibrillation and maintaining rhythm synchrony.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pacing stimuli are delivered according to conventional algorithms, then heart rate support is provided, but Competitive Atrial Pacing is triggered which can initiate atrial fibrillation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety against arrhythmia inductionVSAvoidpacing function effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The algorithm applies preliminary anti-action by detecting the onset of Competitive Atrial Pacing and preemptively delivering a pacing stimulus during the vulnerable period to block the formation of reentrant circuits, thereby preventing atrial fibrillation before it can develop

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The algorithm performs preliminary action by continuously monitoring atrial and ventricular events to detect CAP patterns in advance, and by pre-positioning pacing stimuli at optimal timing to interrupt the retrograde conduction cycle before it perpetuates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If algorithms extend waiting periods to avoid vulnerable periods, then arrhythmia triggering is reduced, but CAP termination capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearrhythmia preventionVSAvoidalgorithm sophistication for CAP termination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The algorithm applies dynamics by adaptively adjusting pacing timing based on real-time detection of CAP patterns and retrograde conduction events, dynamically modifying the waiting period and stimulus delivery timing to both prevent arrhythmia initiation and terminate established CAP cycles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The algorithm implements feedback by continuously monitoring atrial and ventricular electrical events, detecting CAP patterns, and using this information to guide subsequent pacing decisions, creating a closed-loop system that can both prevent and terminate arrhythmias

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If pacemakers stimulate atria to support heart rate, then faster paced rates are achieved, but Competitive Atrial Pacing occurs affecting up to 23.4% of patients

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheart rate responseVSAvoidarrhythmia induction in patients
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The algorithm converts the harmful effect of Competitive Atrial Pacing into a beneficial detection opportunity by using the characteristic retrograde conduction patterns of CAP as a diagnostic marker, allowing the device to identify and intervene in CAP episodes before they trigger atrial fibrillation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS11925807B2Methods for operating a dual-chamber pacemaker to avoid triggering atrial fibrillation and perpetuation of repetitive ventriculo-atrial synchrony
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 ORLOV MICHAEL V
  • US11925807B2 patent drawing
  • US11925807B2 patent drawing
  • US11925807B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Pacemaker-initiated atrial fibrillation during competitive atrial pacing is a common arrhythmia with potentially serious consequences The novel pacing method proposes a novel way to automatically detect and diagnose competitive atrial pacing, and to deliver an intervention via a pacing stimulus in the atrium simultaneously with delivering a pacing stimulus in the ventricle, and doing this after a longer waiting period. By doing this, potentially hazardous scenarios causing atrial fibrillation in competitive atrial pacing are avoided, while the rhythm regularity and the synchrony between the upper and lower chambers of the heart are maintained. At the same time, the vicious cycle of retrograde conduction from the ventricle to the atrium—the culprit of the problem—is terminated and not allowed to reoccur for several subsequent cardiac cycles, thereby preventing the extended propagation of repetitive non-reentrant ventriculo-atrial synchrony.