Implantable Pacemaker MRI Gradient Field Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for safeguarding implantable medical devices, such as pacemakers and ICDs, from MRI fields do not adequately distinguish between static and pulsating gradient magnetic fields, leading to potential parasitic currents and life-threatening fibrillation.

Innovation Solution

An implantable medical device that monitors for magnetic fields and evaluates the strength of pulsed gradient components, switching to appropriate pacing modes and tri-stating electrical outputs to prevent parasitic currents, thereby reducing the risk of abnormal functionality caused by strong pulsed gradient fields.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional safeguard techniques are used to protect implantable medical devices from MRI fields, then the device is protected from static magnetic fields, but the device cannot distinguish between static and pulsating gradient fields, leading to parasitic currents from pulsating gradients

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice protection from MRI fieldsVSAvoidparasitic currents from pulsating gradient fields
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic field protection system is segmented into multiple independent sensing channels: one for detecting static magnetic fields and another for detecting pulsating gradient fields. This segmentation allows the device to differentiate between field types and apply appropriate protection strategies for each, preventing parasitic currents while maintaining protection from static fields.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the detection parameters by using different sensing mechanisms and threshold criteria for static versus pulsating gradient fields. By monitoring temporal variations in magnetic field strength and comparing against predetermined thresholds, the device can identify pulsating gradients and trigger specific protective responses to eliminate parasitic current generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the device blocks all magnetic field effects during MRI, then parasitic currents are prevented, but normal pacing function is also blocked, causing pacing dependent patients to pass out or die

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparasitic currentsVSAvoidpacing function availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The protective response is made dynamic rather than static. The system continuously monitors magnetic field characteristics and adjusts its protective measures in real-time. When pulsating gradient fields are detected, protection is activated; when only static fields are present, normal pacing continues. This dynamic adaptation ensures pacing function remains available when safe while providing protection when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where the sensed magnetic field characteristics continuously inform the control logic about the current environment. Based on this feedback, the device automatically adjusts its operational state between protected and normal pacing modes, ensuring that protective actions are taken only when pulsating gradient fields are actually present, thereby maintaining pacing function availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If diodes and protection components are added to all current pathways, then device protection is improved, but device complexity increases and more components are vulnerable to MRI-induced voltage differentials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice protectionVSAvoidnumber of protection components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces magnetic field sensors as intermediary components that detect pulsating gradient fields before they can induce harmful voltages. These sensors act as early warning systems, allowing the control logic to preemptively activate protective measures. This intermediary detection approach provides protection with fewer components compared to placing diodes throughout the entire circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary action by detecting the presence of pulsating gradient fields before parasitic currents can be generated. The magnetic field sensors continuously monitor for these fields and trigger protective responses in advance, preventing the formation of harmful currents rather than attempting to block them after generation. This preliminary detection reduces the need for extensive protection components throughout the device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively reduces the risk of parasitic currents and abnormal heart rhythms by distinguishing between static and pulsating gradient fields, ensuring safe operation during MRI procedures.

Implementation Method 1

the device monitors for magnetic fields and evaluates the strength of pulsed gradient components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field detection: Magnetometer

Implementation Method 2

the magnetometer is employed to: (1) detect dB/dt, i.e., the time derivative of the scalar magnetic field B

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field measurement: Magnetometer

Implementation Method 3

The device then controls its functions based on the strength of the pulsed gradient components, if any, so as to reduce the risk of abnormal functionality caused by the strong pulsed gradient magnetic fields

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction control: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS7369898B1System and method for responding to pulsed gradient magnetic fields using an implantable medical device
Publication Date: 2008.05.06 PACESETTER INC
  • US7369898B1 patent drawing
  • US7369898B1 patent drawing
  • US7369898B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Implantable medical devices, such as pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), are vulnerable to the powerful magnetic fields associated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In particular, pulsed gradient components, if strong enough, can induce parasitic currents that may damage the device or cause parasitic pacing that may trigger an arrhythmia in the patient. The static magnetic field components of the MRI typically do not induce parasitic currents, even though they may be as strong as the pulsed gradient components. Accordingly, techniques are described herein for specifically addressing the pulsed gradient components of the MRI fields so as to reduce the risk of parasitic currents. In one example, a pacemaker switches to tri-state pacing outputs in the presence of strong pulsed gradient magnetic fields. The device continues with normal bi-state pacing outputs so long as the pulsed gradient fields are not strong, even in the presence of a strong static magnetic field. As an added safety feature, the pacemaker switches to fixed-rate ventricular pacing whenever strong static MRI fields are detected.