Finite Element Package Handling Simulation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current methods for designing packaging containers and handling systems rely on simplified specifications, leading to approximate performance predictions that are not reliable for actual prototypes, limiting design options and requiring expensive physical testing, which is time-consuming and impractical.
Innovation Solution
A computer-aided method that models the interaction of package designs with handling elements, allowing for variations in input conditions and response analysis, enabling accurate evaluation of package and system designs without the need for physical prototypes, using finite element analysis and empirical validation to refine model parameters.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If simplified specifications are used for container and handling element modeling, then computational speed and ease of use are improved, but accuracy of performance prediction deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from simplified geometric specifications to detailed finite element models with accurate material properties, boundary conditions, and contact parameters. This allows the model to capture complex nonlinear behaviors including plastic deformation, material anisotropy, and geometric nonlinearity, thereby significantly improving prediction accuracy while managing computational complexity through efficient solution algorithms.
2Measurement precision
If extensive physical prototyping is conducted to evaluate design alternatives, then accuracy of design evaluation is improved, but cost and time consumption increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent employs virtual copying through high-fidelity finite element models that replicate the physical behavior of containers and handling elements. These digital twins enable accurate evaluation of design alternatives, performance optimization, and failure analysis without requiring physical prototypes. The models incorporate accurate material constitutive laws, geometric nonlinearities, and contact mechanics to predict real-world behavior, eliminating the need for time-consuming physical testing iterations.
3Productivity
If simplified models are used for package handling system analysis, then computational speed is improved, but reliability of simulation results deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent achieves reliable simulation results by implementing comprehensive material models that capture elastic-plastic behavior, strain rate effects, and material anisotropy. The model incorporates accurate geometric nonlinearities, contact mechanics with friction, and boundary conditions that reflect actual handling system operation. These detailed parameter representations ensure simulation reliability while efficient solution algorithms maintain computational speed.
Data Source
AI summary
A method comprises steps of: providing an initial package design, providing an initial package-handling element design, modeling the interaction of the package and the package-handling element, and altering one of the package design or the package-handling element design according to the results of the model. Wherein the initial package-handling element design comprises at least one item selected from the group consisting of: a motion transfer component comprising a combination of discrete geometrically defined elements, package guide rails, package guide rail supports, vacuum conveying components, and combinations thereof. And wherein the interaction reflects the package interaction with the discrete elements of a multi-element motion transfer component or the package guide rails having a flexibility greater than zero, or package guide rail supports having a finite stiffness, or a combination thereof.