Package Design Substrate Segmentation and Seam Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated package customization systems face challenges in accommodating varied desired package sizes, often resulting in inefficient use of substrates with significant waste, as they are limited by available substrate sizes and struggle to fit complex structures without adverse effects on functional connections or assembly ease.

Innovation Solution

A system that generates package design files by identifying cut and fold line instructions to split a three-dimensional structure across multiple substrates, converting selected fold lines to seams, and imparting functional elements to ensure efficient substrate use and maintain structural integrity and ease of assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If a single substrate is used for package construction, then substrate usage is simplified and processing is easier, but significant wasted space occurs and large packages cannot be accommodated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate utilization areaVSAvoidsubstrate waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The package flat is divided into multiple substrates by converting a fold line to a seam, creating separate substrate units that can be processed independently. This segmentation allows each substrate to be optimized for its specific portion of the package, reducing overall waste while maintaining the ability to construct the complete package structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If the package structure is designed to fit available substrate sizes, then production is simplified, but packages with dimensions exceeding substrate limits cannot be created

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackage size flexibilityVSAvoidproduction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the package flat across multiple substrates separated by seams, the system can accommodate package dimensions that exceed single substrate limits. The segmentation allows flexible combination of standard substrate sizes to create larger or more complex package structures without requiring custom oversized substrates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The seam acts as an intermediary element that connects multiple substrates to form a continuous package flat. This intermediary structure enables the system to bridge the gap between limited substrate dimensions and larger package requirements, maintaining manufacturing simplicity while expanding design capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Area of stationary object

If fold lines are converted to seams to enable multi-substrate construction, then substrate waste is reduced and larger packages are enabled, but functional connections may be adversely affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate utilization areaVSAvoidfunctional connection integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The seam serves as a controlled intermediary that replaces the fold line while maintaining the necessary structural and functional connections. By carefully designing the seam configuration and associated functional elements, the system preserves connection integrity between package facets even though the continuous fold line has been divided into separate substrate segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different properties to different regions: fold lines remain in areas where continuous bending is needed, while seams are strategically placed in areas where substrate separation is beneficial for waste reduction. This localized differentiation maintains functional connections where needed while enabling multi-substrate construction where appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Loss of substance

If multiple substrates are used to reduce waste and accommodate large packages, then substrate utilization improves, but the complexity of imparting cut lines and fold lines across multiple substrates increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate waste reductionVSAvoidcut and crease operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The package flat is segmented into multiple substrates with clearly defined boundaries at seam locations. This segmentation allows the cutting and creasing operations to be performed independently on each substrate, simplifying the overall process despite the increased number of substrates. Each substrate can be processed through standard equipment without requiring complex coordinated operations across multiple pieces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9916401B2Creation of cut files for personalized package design using multiple substrates
Publication Date: 2018.03.13 GENESEE VALLEY INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US9916401B2 patent drawing
  • US9916401B2 patent drawing
  • US9916401B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A package design system creates one or more package design files by creating cut line instructions and fold line instructions. If the system determines that the package should be split across two or more substrates, it will select a fold line and convert the selected fold line to a seam. Conversion to a seam may occur by creating cut line instructions for the selected fold line, imparting a first set of functional elements on a first side of the seam, and imparting a second set of functional elements on a second side of the seam. The first set of functional elements and the second set of functional elements will form a functional connection when the three-dimensional structure is formed.