Package-type compressor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing package-type compressor design faces limitations in cooling performance due to a single air suction port, long cooling air flow paths, and high pressure loss, making it difficult to increase the flow rate of cooling air for the body unit and controller, and balancing the flow rates between different ducts.

Innovation Solution

The design includes multiple cooling air inlets on opposite sides of the casing, a fan duct with a vertically oriented cooling fan, and a cooling duct to efficiently direct cooling air to the body unit and controller, with the center of the fan duct's suction port offset to balance airflow and improve cooling performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single air suction port is used in the prior-art technique, then the structure is simple, but the cooling performance is insufficient due to long flow paths and high pressure loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidcooling performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single air suction port is segmented into multiple air suction ports positioned at different locations on the casing. This segmentation shortens the cooling air flow paths, reduces pressure loss, and improves cooling performance for both the body unit and controller without significantly increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Air suction ports are added at multiple spatial locations (different dimensions) on the casing surface, transitioning from a single-point suction to a multi-point distributed suction system. This dimensional expansion optimizes the cooling air flow distribution and reduces path length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the cooling air flow path is extended to reach all components, then all components can be cooled, but the pressure loss increases and flow rate decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling coverageVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling air flow path is segmented into multiple shorter paths originating from different air suction ports. Each port serves specific components in its proximity, reducing the overall path length and pressure loss while maintaining comprehensive cooling coverage for all heat-generating components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different air suction ports are strategically positioned to provide localized cooling to specific components. The cooling air flow paths are optimized locally for each component group, ensuring adequate cooling without requiring excessively long flow paths that would increase pressure loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If cooling air is directed through long ducts to the controller, then the controller can be cooled, but the flow rate to the controller is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller coolingVSAvoidcooling air flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system is segmented to provide dedicated cooling paths for the controller, separate from the body unit cooling paths. This segmentation ensures that the controller receives sufficient cooling air flow rate through its own optimized flow path, improving both cooling reliability and flow rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediate air suction port is positioned near the controller to serve as a dedicated cooling air source. This intermediary port acts as a local cooling station, providing sufficient cooling air flow rate to the controller without requiring air to travel through long ducts from distant suction ports.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances cooling performance for both the body unit and controller, reduces pressure loss, and allows for a more balanced airflow, eliminating the need for a dedicated cooling fan and reducing the compressor's size while maintaining effective sound insulation.

Implementation Method 1

a cooling fan (centrifugal fan) accommodated in the case

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

The cooling air having cooled the motor and the controller cools the heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

an air cooling type heat exchanger arranged above the delivery port of the fan duct and below the cooling air outlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS10907636B2Package-type compressor
Publication Date: 2021.02.02 HITACHI IND EQUIP SYST CO LTD
  • US10907636B2 patent drawing
  • US10907636B2 patent drawing
  • US10907636B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a package-type compressor that can improve cooling performance for cooling a body unit and a control panel. The package-type compressor includes: a cooling fan accommodated in a fan duct to induce a flow of cooling air taken in through inlets and discharged through an outlet; a machine chamber that causes the cooling air taken in at the inlet to flow along a body unit; and a cooling duct that causes the cooling air taken in at the inlet to flow along the control panel. A center position of the suction port of the fan duct is offset away from the inlet and toward the inlet with respect to a center position of a drive shaft of a motor of the body unit.