Packaging Machine Belt Speed Control for Jam Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional packaging systems face issues with gentle handling of filled packages, particularly soft packaging, as they can damage each other when touching or being pressed against adjacent packages, leading to jams and inefficiencies due to varying nominal and set outputs of packaging devices.

Innovation Solution

A packaging system with a central controller that monitors and adjusts the speeds of infeed, outfeed, and conveyor belts to maintain a constant throughput, ensuring packages are spaced at a minimum distance and preventing jams by dynamically adjusting the set output of each device based on downstream capacity, using sensors to determine actual packing density and belt speeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If packages are transported on belts with high speed and high density, then productivity increases, but packages may touch or press against each other causing damage

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidpackage damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future package positions and adjusting belt speeds in advance to prevent packages from touching. The control unit calculates predicted positions based on current positions and speeds, then proactively adjusts operational parameters before contact occurs, preventing damage before it happens.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic speed adjustment of conveyor belts based on real-time package positions and predicted future states. Instead of fixed speeds, the control unit continuously modifies belt speeds to maintain safe distances between packages, enabling both high productivity and damage prevention through adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a clamp or stopper is provided at the infeed belt to prevent jams, then reliability improves, but packages may form jams downstream and touch each other

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejam preventionVSAvoidpackage contact
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from sensors detecting package positions to continuously adjust belt speeds. The control unit receives position information, predicts future positions, and adjusts operational parameters based on this feedback loop, preventing jams and package contact without mechanical clamps or stoppers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces mechanical jam-prevention devices (clamps and stoppers) with a control system that uses sensors and algorithms to predict and prevent jams through speed adjustment. This substitutes mechanical intervention with intelligent control, eliminating the need for physical stoppers that cause package contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple packaging devices with different nominal outputs are arranged sequentially, then versatility increases, but coordination becomes complex and packages may backup on belts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice configurationVSAvoidsystem coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit serves multiple functions: it detects package positions, predicts future positions, calculates optimal speeds, and coordinates multiple belts with different nominal outputs. This multi-functional control system simplifies the coordination of diverse packaging devices while maintaining versatility in system configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calculations of predicted package positions and required speed adjustments before packages actually reach transfer points. This advance planning allows smooth coordination between devices with different outputs without complex real-time reactions, reducing system complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3313737B1Packaging machine and method for operation of the packaging machine
Publication Date: 2018.12.26 SIG TECH AG
  • EP3313737B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3313737B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2c
  • EP3313737B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a packaging system, comprising at least two packaging devices (2), wherein each packaging device (2) has an inlet belt (4) and an outlet belt (6) and the inlet belt (4) of the packaging device (2) feeds packagings (12) and the outlet belt (6) receives packagings (12) processed by the packaging device (2), a conveyor belt (10) arranged between the outlet belt (6) of a first packaging device (2) and the inlet belt (4) of a second packaging device (2), and a central controller (26). A constant throughput through the packaging system is achieved in that the central controller (26) determines at least the actual speed of the inlet belts (4) and the outlet belts (6) of the packaging devices (2) and of the conveyor belt (10) and in that the central controller (26) determines at least the actual packing density of the inlet belts (4) and the outlet belts (6) of the packaging devices (2) and of the conveyor belt (10), and in that the central controller (26) determines at least target speeds for the inlet belts (4) and the outlet belts (6) of the packaging devices (2) and for the conveyor belt (10) in accordance with the actual packing density and the actual speeds.