Packaging Box Centering Recesses and Adhesive Tabs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing packaging boxes tend to slide when stacked, leading to handling issues during transport, and previous solutions either require expensive accessories or weaken the box structure, while also being fragile and not suitable for low grammage or perfect vertical stacking.

Innovation Solution

A packaging box design featuring a bottom with recesses and a top with adhesively bonded tongues of complementary shape, where the recesses and tongues are entirely located inside the faces, allowing for effective centering and interlocking without the need for additional accessories, and a method and device for manufacturing these boxes using corrugated sheet board cutouts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If lateral studs with orifices are used for centering boxes, then sliding is prevented, but the system becomes fragile and cannot withstand repeated handling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentering system durabilityVSAvoidhandling resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The centering function is segmented into multiple interaction points: recesses in the bottom and tongues on the top face, each contributing to stability. This distributes mechanical stress across multiple locations rather than concentrating it in single studs, improving durability during repeated handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tongues are nested within recesses of complementary shape, creating an interlocking mechanism where one box fits into another. This nested configuration provides robust mechanical interconnection that withstands repeated handling better than surface-level stud-orifice systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If tabs with complementary shapes are used for interlocking, then lateral blocking is achieved, but the blank shape requires a double set of tabs increasing complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelateral blockingVSAvoidblank shape complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interlocking mechanism is extracted from the side walls and relocated to the top and bottom faces. Instead of requiring tabs on all four sides, the solution uses recesses in the bottom and tongues on the top, simplifying the blank shape while maintaining lateral blocking through vertical stacking interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The blocking mechanism transitions from lateral (horizontal) tabs to vertical dimension features: recesses and tongues extend in the vertical direction, preventing lateral sliding through height-based interference rather than width-based tab engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If tongues are held in side walls and adhesively bonded, then good centering and blocking are achieved, but the walls are weakened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentering and blocking performanceVSAvoidwall strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The adhesive bonding operation is extracted from the side walls and relocated to the top face. Tongues are now bonded to the top surface rather than being embedded in side walls, preserving wall integrity while maintaining centering and blocking functions through the top-face bonding mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The bonding location shifts from the vertical side walls to the horizontal top face. This dimensional relocation allows the same centering function to be achieved without compromising structural wall strength, as the top face is a non-load-bearing surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Manufacturing precision

If recesses and tongues are used for centering, then perfect vertical stacking is enabled, but additional manufacturing steps are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevertical stacking alignmentVSAvoidbox formation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The centering recesses and blocking tongues are merged into a single integrated feature set formed during the die-cutting process. Rather than adding separate centering components, the recesses and tongues are incorporated into the box blank itself, achieving precision stacking without additional manufacturing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The recesses and tongues are pre-formed during the blank fabrication stage using die-cutting, before the boxes are assembled and stacked. This preliminary creation of centering features eliminates the need for post-assembly adjustments or additional centering operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution prevents sliding during stacking, enables perfect vertical alignment, and allows for lightweight grammage while maintaining box strength, thus optimizing load-bearing capacity and simplifying the formation process.

Implementation Method 1

the top comprising at least two tongues adhesively bonded onto its upper face

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS10239650B2Packaging boxes with centring tab, cutouts and set of cutouts, method and device for producing such boxes
Publication Date: 2019.03.26 DS SMITH PACKAGING FRANCE SAS
  • US10239650B2 patent drawing
  • US10239650B2 patent drawing
  • US10239650B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A packaging box, cutouts, method and device for producing corrugated cardboard boxes comprising walls, a base (6) and a cover (7), the inner face of the base being provided with at least two recesses (33) and the cover comprising at least two tabs (38) adhered to the upper face thereof, directly above the recesses of complementary shape. The recesses and/or the tabs are situated fully inside the corresponding face or faces (31, 32).