Packaging Fault Analysis Display for Downtime Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Packaging systems often experience fluctuations in performance, leading to underperformance or complete stoppages due to unidentified error sources, resulting in reduced productivity and increased downtime.

Innovation Solution

A packaging system equipped with a performance graphic display and an error analysis section that identifies the cause of underperformance or stoppages by referencing a stored error source list, allowing operators to quickly address issues and optimize system operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual error identification methods are used (operators manually entering error sources), then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases due to prolonged downtime and loss of information about error sources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaverage system performanceVSAvoiderror analysis section
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-stores a comprehensive error source list in memory before operations begin. When performance deviations occur, the error analysis section automatically compares real-time data against this pre-prepared reference list to identify error sources, eliminating the need for manual error entry and reducing downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors packaging system performance and provides real-time feedback through the display unit. When performance drops below thresholds, the error analysis section automatically identifies error sources from the stored list and presents them to operators, creating a closed-loop feedback system that reduces information loss and improves productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If real-time performance monitoring is implemented, then loss of information about system state is reduced, but device complexity increases due to additional monitoring components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance historyVSAvoidperformance graph display
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The display unit serves multiple functions: it shows real-time performance graphs, displays identified error sources, and provides operational feedback. This multi-functional approach reduces the need for separate dedicated displays for each function, minimizing the increase in device complexity while maximizing information retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The performance graph acts as an intermediary visual representation that translates complex real-time performance data into an easily interpretable format. This intermediary layer allows the system to monitor and retain detailed performance information without requiring complex processing or additional storage systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If automatic error source identification is implemented, then time loss for error diagnosis is reduced, but device complexity increases due to the error analysis section and stored error lists

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedowntimeVSAvoiderror analysis section
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The error source list is pre-stored in memory with all potential error sources documented before operations begin. When performance deviations occur, the system automatically compares real-time data against this pre-prepared reference, enabling rapid error identification and reducing downtime without requiring complex real-time analysis algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The error analysis section automatically performs error identification and diagnosis without requiring operator intervention or manual error entry. The system serves itself by autonomously monitoring performance, detecting deviations, querying the stored error list, and presenting identified error sources, thereby minimizing time loss while keeping the added complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP4068030B1Packaging system and method with fault analysis
Publication Date: 2024.09.11 MULTIVAC SEPP HAGGENMULLER GMBH & CO KG
  • EP4068030B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4068030B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4068030B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

In a packaging system (1) comprising a packaging machine (2) and at least one additional component (13, 14, 15) provided for the packaging machine (2), the packaging system (1) includes a display (27) and a computer unit (31). The system is configured to display a performance graph (35) on the display (27). The computer unit (31) includes a fault analysis section (32) designed to detect a stop or reduced performance of the packaging system (1) and, upon detection of a stop or reduced performance, to identify a fault source from a fault source list (34) stored in memory, so that the identified fault source is displayed on the display (27).