Packet Aggregation for QoS and Reliability in Wireless Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing packet aggregation schemes in communication systems face issues with unreliable transmission and poor Quality of Service (QoS) when handling packets with different destination addresses, particularly due to the inability to receive ACK signals and maintain delay and jitter characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A method for creating aggregation packets in a communication system that receives QoS information and data rate information from the upper layer, and channel status information from the lower layer, allowing for the creation and transmission of multicast and unicast aggregation packets that support QoS functions, enabling reliable transmission even for packets with different destination addresses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If packet aggregation scheme is used to increase transmission packet length, then data throughput is improved, but reliability deteriorates when packets having different destination addresses are collected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata throughputVSAvoidtransmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the aggregation process by creating separate aggregation queues for unicast packets and multicast packets. This segmentation allows each queue to handle packets with specific destination address characteristics, ensuring that unicast packets (which require ACK for reliability) are aggregated separately from multicast packets. The segmentation resolves the contradiction by maintaining reliability for unicast while still enabling aggregation for throughput improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by treating different types of packets (unicast vs. multicast) with different aggregation rules and quality characteristics. Unicast packets receive priority handling with ACK mechanisms, while multicast packets use different aggregation strategies. This local differentiation allows the system to optimize for throughput where appropriate while maintaining reliability where needed, resolving the contradiction between aggregation benefits and reliability concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of energy

If packet aggregation scheme is used to reduce overheads, then resource efficiency is improved, but QoS characteristics deteriorate due to sequential aggregation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverhead reductionVSAvoidQoS characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic elements by implementing priority-based scheduling and real-time QoS parameter monitoring within the aggregation process. The system dynamically adjusts aggregation behavior based on packet priority, delay requirements, and jitter characteristics. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain QoS characteristics while still achieving overhead reduction through selective aggregation of packets with compatible QoS requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying mechanisms to preserve QoS information and packet metadata throughout the aggregation process. By maintaining copies of critical QoS parameters and packet characteristics, the system can make informed aggregation decisions and ensure that aggregated packets still meet their QoS requirements. This copying approach allows overhead reduction while preserving the necessary information for QoS maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Device complexity

If sequential packet aggregation is used to simplify processing, then device complexity is reduced, but ability to maintain delay and jitter characteristics deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing complexityVSAvoiddelay and jitter characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the packet processing function into multiple specialized components: classification module for identifying packet types, priority determination module for assessing QoS requirements, aggregation module for combining compatible packets, and scheduling module for managing transmission timing. This segmentation maintains QoS characteristics by ensuring each component handles specific aspects of the complex processing, while the overall system complexity is managed through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary structures such as aggregation queues and scheduling buffers that mediate between packet arrival and transmission. These intermediaries allow the system to manage delay and jitter characteristics by controlling the timing and order of packet transmission, while keeping the processing logic organized and manageable. The intermediaries act as buffers that smooth out the complexity of QoS management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9059916B2Apparatus and method for transmitting packets in a communication system
Publication Date: 2015.06.16 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US9059916B2 patent drawing
  • US9059916B2 patent drawing
  • US9059916B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and method for transmitting packets in a communication system. The packet transmission method for the communication system includes the steps of a) receiving Quality of Service (QoS) information and data rate information from an upper layer, b) receiving channel status information of wireless stations from a lower layer, and c) creating an aggregation packet according to the received information, and transmitting the created aggregation packet to a Media Access Control (MAC) layer.