Packet Filtering Re-Evaluation Using Updated Threat Intelligence

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network security systems face challenges in applying updated cyber threat intelligence to previous packet filtering data, leading to inefficiencies and potential loss of important data due to the volume and complexity of cyber threats, lack of resources, and disincentives for retroactive application of updated threat intelligence.

Innovation Solution

A cyber threat analysis system applies updated cyber threat intelligence to packet filtering output data generated based on earlier intelligence, identifying relevant data using earlier intelligence to guide the application of new criteria, thereby enhancing detection and prevention of cyber threats.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If updated cyber threat intelligence is applied to all previous packet filtering data, then threat detection accuracy is improved, but resource consumption and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments packet filtering data by associating each data record with a specific filtering rule identifier. This allows the system to divide the large volume of historical data into manageable segments that can be selectively re-evaluated based on updated threat intelligence, rather than processing all data uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by maintaining packet filtering output data in a structured format with rule associations before updated intelligence arrives. This preliminary structuring enables rapid retrieval and selective re-evaluation when updates occur, avoiding the need to reprocess all historical data from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If comprehensive packet filtering rules are maintained to ensure thorough threat detection, then security coverage is improved, but data volume and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the filtering rule set into discrete, identifiable rules with unique identifiers. Each rule can be independently updated, stored, and re-evaluated. This segmentation reduces complexity by making the rule base manageable and allowing selective application of updates to specific rule sets rather than requiring system-wide changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where packet filtering output data is stored with associations to specific filtering rules. This feedback loop allows the system to track which rules generated which output data, enabling efficient re-evaluation when rules are updated and providing visibility into the effectiveness of each rule.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If historical packet filtering data is retained for extended periods to enable retroactive threat analysis, then detection capability is improved, but storage requirements and data management burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretroactive detection capabilityVSAvoiddata storage volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by structuring and storing packet filtering output data with explicit associations to filtering rule identifiers during the initial filtering process. This preliminary organization enables efficient retrieval and selective re-evaluation of specific data sets when threat intelligence updates occur, without requiring retention of all possible data combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and retains only the essential elements needed for retroactive analysis - specifically, the association between packet filtering output data and filtering rule identifiers. By extracting only these critical relationships rather than storing complete contextual information, the system enables effective retroactive threat analysis with reduced storage requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12592947B2Systems and methods for cyber threat detection based on new and/or updated cyber threat intelligence
Publication Date: 2026.03.31 CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS INC
  • US12592947B2 patent drawing
  • US12592947B2 patent drawing
  • US12592947B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and apparatuses are described for detection and/or analysis of cyber threats based on updated cyber threat intelligence associated with cyber threats. Packet filtering output data such as logs of packet communications and/or copies of packets may be generated based on first cyber threat intelligence associated with a cyber threat. Updated criteria based on subsequent updated cyber threat intelligence may then be applied to the packet filtering output data.