Transmission Packet Filtering via Protocol and Web App Permissions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

User devices connected to private networks are vulnerable to cybercrimes due to unfiltered access to the open internet, which can lead to unauthorized access, data theft, alteration, or destruction, and resource wastage in mitigating these threats.

Innovation Solution

A cyber security service provider's control infrastructure inspects and selectively blocks internet protocol packets from user devices based on customized filtering policies, determining permissions based on IP addresses, ports, protocols, and web applications to prevent malicious activities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If user devices are allowed unfiltered access to the open internet, then ease of operation and network connectivity are improved, but security and vulnerability to cybercrimes worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork connectivityVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A security device is introduced as an intermediary between user devices and the open internet. The security device inspects transmission packets and applies customized filtering policies based on IP addresses, ports, protocols, and web applications, allowing legitimate traffic while blocking malicious content, thus maintaining both connectivity and security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The filtering process is segmented into multiple hierarchical levels: IP address filtering, port filtering, protocol filtering, and web application filtering. This multi-layered segmentation allows progressive refinement of security policies, enabling granular control over network traffic while maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If customized filtering policies are applied to inspect transmission packets, then security and protection from cybercrimes are improved, but device complexity and processing requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidfiltering system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex filtering system is divided into four distinct filtering modules: IP address filtering, port filtering, protocol filtering, and web application filtering. Each module handles a specific aspect of packet inspection independently, making the overall complex system manageable through modular design and reducing processing overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Customized filtering policies are pre-configured and stored in the security device before actual packet inspection begins. The security device maintains a database of permitted and blocked IP addresses, ports, protocols, and web applications, allowing rapid comparison and decision-making during transmission without real-time complex analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If multiple levels of filtering (IP address, port, protocol, web application) are applied, then security coverage and protection effectiveness are improved, but processing time and network latency worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidpacket processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The four-level filtering process is implemented as sequential but independent stages. Each filtering level (IP address, port, protocol, web application) operates as a separate processing stage that can be efficiently implemented using pre-configured rules, minimizing redundant processing and reducing overall packet processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The security device applies filtering progressively, starting with broader IP address filtering and moving to more specific port, protocol, and web application filtering only when necessary. This partial action approach ensures that most packets are quickly processed at higher levels without requiring full deep inspection of all packets, reducing average processing time while maintaining comprehensive security coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12621262B2Customized filtering of transmissions from a device
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 720 IT UAB
  • US12621262B2 patent drawing
  • US12621262B2 patent drawing
  • US12621262B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method including receiving, by a security device from a user device that is in a private network, a transmission packet for communication to a destination device over an open network; determining, by the security device based on receiving the transmission packet, whether the user device is permitted to transmit the transmission packet to the destination device over the open network; determining, by the security device based on determining that the user device is permitted to transmit the transmission packet to the destination device, whether the user device is permitted to utilize a protocol utilized by the user device to transmit the transmission packet; and determining, by the security device based on determining that the user device is permitted to utilize the protocol, whether the user device is permitted to utilize a transmission web application utilized by the user device to transmit the transmission packet is disclosed.