Packet Importance Prioritization for Congested Uplink Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current telecommunication solutions fail to effectively prioritize the transmission of important packets and PDU sets in wireless communication networks, particularly in scenarios with network congestion.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a packet discarding mechanism based on importance levels (PSI) and utilizing uplink grants to prioritize the transmission of important PDU sets and packets, along with logical channel prioritization (LCP) procedures to ensure their preferential allocation of resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If packet discarding mechanism based on importance levels is implemented, then transmission reliability of important packets is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The packet data units are segmented into different importance levels (e.g., high importance and low importance packets). The system then applies different handling mechanisms to different segments, such as prioritizing high importance packets for transmission and potentially discarding or delaying low importance packets during congestion. This segmentation enables the complex reliability improvement to be managed through structured differentiation rather than monolithic handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Speed

If uplink grants are used to prioritize important PDU sets, then transmission speed of important packets is improved, but loss of information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission speedVSAvoidloss of information
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

Different quality levels are assigned to different packet types based on their importance. High importance packets receive superior transmission resources and faster processing, while low importance packets receive standard or reduced resources. This local differentiation of quality ensures that critical information is transmitted efficiently without unnecessarily sacrificing the transmission of less critical but still valid information, thereby managing the trade-off between speed and information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If logical channel prioritization is implemented, then productivity of network is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The logical channel prioritization mechanism dynamically adjusts transmission priorities based on current network conditions and packet importance levels. The system can adapt its prioritization strategy in real-time, shifting resources between different logical channels and packet types according to congestion levels and QoS requirements. This dynamic approach improves network productivity by optimizing resource allocation while managing complexity through adaptive rather than static rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250317807A1Systems, methods, and devices for enhancements based on packet importance
Publication Date: 2025.10.09 APPLE INC
  • US20250317807A1 patent drawing
  • US20250317807A1 patent drawing
  • US20250317807A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are provided an uplink grant prioritized for use by one or more logical channels buffered with important protocol data unit sets. In some scenarios the uplink grant is prioritized for logical channels corresponding to data radio bearers having an activated packet set importance-based discarding mechanism. Techniques are provided for an adaptive LCP procedure that may be applied to such logical channels. Techniques are provided for scheduling requests and status reporting based upon the activated mechanism. These and many other features and examples are described.