Packet-Level Media Rating for Audience Adaptability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current media content distribution systems face challenges in managing content ratings, as they often require maintaining multiple versions of media programs with different ratings, leading to increased storage costs and potential customer dissatisfaction due to inappropriate content exposure, especially when younger audiences are present.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system where media content is rated at the packet level, allowing media servers to determine and packetize rating levels for each segment, and client devices to compare these ratings with user permissions, rendering or blocking content accordingly, and optionally providing alternative content when inappropriate material is detected.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple copies of the same media program are provided with different ratings, then the suitability for different audiences is improved, but the storage requirements and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuitability for different audiencesVSAvoidstorage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the media program into multiple packets, each assigned a rating level. Instead of storing multiple complete versions of the media program, the system divides the content into granular packets that can be selectively rendered based on rating comparisons, dramatically reducing storage requirements while maintaining adaptability for different audiences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different rating levels to different packets within the same media program rather than creating separate complete versions. This local differentiation allows the system to provide audience-appropriate content by selecting specific packets based on permission levels, eliminating the need to store multiple full copies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the entire media program is rated, then the rating coverage is complete, but the precision in identifying inappropriate scenes is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverating coverageVSAvoididentification of inappropriate scenes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the media program into discrete packets and assigns rating levels to individual packets rather than rating the entire program as a single unit. This segmentation enables precise identification of inappropriate scenes at the packet level while maintaining complete rating coverage across the entire program through systematic packet-by-packet rating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical approach of rating entire programs with a digital packet-level rating system. By substituting the coarse-grained program-level rating mechanism with fine-grained packet-level rating, the system achieves both complete coverage and high precision in identifying inappropriate content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple versions of media programs are maintained, then audience coverage is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudience coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal packet-level rating system that serves multiple audience types through a single media program structure. The same set of rated packets can be selectively rendered for different permission levels, eliminating the need for separate version management systems and reducing overall system complexity while maintaining broad audience coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic content selection mechanism where the rendering of packets is determined by real-time comparison between packet rating levels and user permission levels. This dynamic approach replaces the static complexity of maintaining multiple fixed versions with a flexible, on-the-fly selection process that adapts to different users without increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If packet-level rating is implemented, then the content control precision is improved, but the processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent control precisionVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments content control into discrete packet-level operations, where each packet is independently rated and evaluated. This segmentation enables high precision content control at the packet level while managing processing complexity through systematic, modular evaluation of individual packets rather than complex analysis of entire programs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3090570B1Rendering rated media content on client devices using packet-level ratings
Publication Date: 2019.12.18 ALCATEL LUCENT SA
  • EP3090570B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3090570B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3090570B1 patent drawingFigure 4A~6

AI summary

A content delivery system provides packet-level ratings of media content for use by client devices in rendering the media content thereon. A client device can store a permission level and compare the permission level with respective rating levels included in received media packets. The media content within the received media packets is rendered on the client device on the condition that the permission level compares favorably with the associated rating level and blocked on the condition that the permission level compares unfavorably with the associated rating level.