Packet Repetition Detection by Time Delay in Vehicular Wireless Links

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless vehicular communications, distinguishing between new and repetitive messages is challenging, especially when different communication standards are used, leading to inefficiencies and compatibility issues.

Innovation Solution

The method involves determining message repetition based on time delays between packets, using a threshold to differentiate between new and repeated messages, allowing for efficient processing and maintaining compatibility with older protocols by setting specific time intervals for repetition bursts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If time delay threshold is used to distinguish new and repeated messages, then processing efficiency is improved, but accuracy in distinguishing messages from different transmitters deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidmessage distinction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the time delay analysis by introducing a reference transmitter identifier. Instead of applying a single universal time threshold to all messages, the system divides message evaluation into transmitter-specific segments. Each transmitter has its own reference time delay stored in memory, allowing the receiver to accurately distinguish between new messages and repetitions from the same transmitter while avoiding false identification of messages from different transmitters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If buffer size and computing resources are reduced, then resource efficiency is improved, but capability to handle complex communication scenarios deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource requirementsVSAvoidcommunication scenario handling capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential identification feature (transmitter identifier) from the complex message structure and uses it as a reference key. Instead of storing and analyzing entire message buffers or performing complex computations, the system extracts and stores only the critical reference transmitter identifier and its associated time delay characteristics. This extraction approach dramatically reduces buffer size and computing resource requirements while maintaining the ability to handle diverse communication scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If compatibility with legacy protocols is maintained, then system interoperability is improved, but complexity of handling multiple standards deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotocol compatibilityVSAvoidmulti-standard handling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal reference transmitter identification mechanism that functions across multiple communication standards and protocols. The same time delay comparison approach and reference identifier storage method work whether the system is handling legacy protocols or newer standards. This multi-functional approach allows a single implementation to maintain compatibility with various protocols without requiring separate complex handling logic for each standard, thereby reducing overall system complexity while preserving broad interoperability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3796579B1Wireless communication with time-delay repetition detection
Publication Date: 2022.12.14 NXP BV
  • EP3796579B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3796579B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3796579B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to ascertaining whether data messages are repetitions of a previous data message. As may be implemented in accordance with one or more embodiments characterized herein, data packets (130/131) are received (102) and which use a first time delay relative to transmission of a previous data packet (120/121) by a different transmitter. Repetitions (110A/111A) of data packets are also received (102), and which use a second time delay relative to transmission of a previous data packet (110/111) by the same transmitter. The second time delay is less than the first time delay. The received packet is identified (102) as being a repetition of an immediately-previous data packet based on a time delay between the data packet and the immediately-previous data packet, relative to the first and second time delays.