Automated Packing System Corner Stabilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated systems face challenges in efficiently handling and packing lightweight shipping containers, particularly cardboard boxes, which are prone to tipping during high-throughput operations, and require systems that can accommodate a variety of container sizes and securely stabilize them for efficient packing.

Innovation Solution

An automated packing system utilizing a multidirectional conveyor system with vacuum cups and programmable motion devices to secure and manipulate lightweight containers, incorporating weight sensing and multidirectional units to stabilize and rotate containers for precise packing, ensuring efficient handling and packing of various container sizes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated systems operate at high throughput to improve productivity, then packing speed increases, but lightweight containers become prone to tipping and require additional stabilization mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacking speedVSAvoidcontainer stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary stabilization by positioning lightweight containers against a corner formed by two braces before the packing operation begins. This pre-positioning prevents tipping during high-speed automated packing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The corner formed by two braces acts as an intermediary stabilization structure. The container is positioned against this corner, which provides mechanical support and prevents tipping during high-throughput operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system accommodates a variety of container sizes to improve adaptability, then versatility increases, but the complexity of securing and positioning containers increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer size accommodationVSAvoidsecuring mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The corner positioning system using two braces provides a universal solution that accommodates various container sizes. The same corner structure serves multiple containers of different dimensions without requiring size-specific securing mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system adapts to different container sizes by allowing the container to be positioned at different locations along the corner braces. The positioning parameters (distance from corner, orientation) are adjusted based on container dimensions while using the same basic securing mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If human personnel perform manual packing to maintain flexibility, then adaptability to various goods is improved, but productivity and efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacking flexibilityVSAvoidpacking efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system performs packing operations without human intervention. The robot or automated mechanism positions containers, places goods, and secures packages autonomously, maintaining flexibility through programmable control while dramatically improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual human packing operations with an automated mechanical system. The automated container positioning and securing mechanisms perform functions that previously required human dexterity and judgment, achieving both efficiency and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If containers are positioned freely on the conveyor to improve ease of operation, then loading efficiency increases, but container stability and positioning precision decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer loading easeVSAvoidcontainer positioning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The corner formed by two braces serves as an intermediary positioning structure. Containers are guided to this corner, which provides a fixed reference point for precise positioning while maintaining ease of operation through the natural flow of the conveyor system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides localized precision positioning at the corner location where containers are secured. The two braces create a defined corner zone that ensures accurate positioning, while the rest of the conveyor system maintains free-flowing ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system maintains high throughput by stabilizing lightweight containers, allowing for efficient packing and scanning operations, reducing human intervention, and ensuring accurate placement and orientation of objects within containers.

Implementation Method 1

vacuum cups and programmable motion devices to secure and manipulate lightweight containers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Data Source

PatentUS20250250050A1Systems and methods for automated packaging and processing containers for shipping with place stack transfer management
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 BERKSHIRE GREY OPERATING CO INC
  • US20250250050A1 patent drawing
  • US20250250050A1 patent drawing
  • US20250250050A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated packing system for placing at least one object into a container is disclosed. The automated packing system includes an input conveyance system for providing empty containers to a packing station, a multidirectional unit at the packing station for receiving the container and for urging the container against a corner provided by two braces, a programmable motion device for packing the container with objects provided by source containers, and an output conveyance system for receiving the container from the multidirectional unit following packing.